Question:
I’ve been doing lots of research on taking HRT and I am also reading what people write and it seems to me that the women taking the hormones seem to be happy and feel great. I wonder, did it take you guys a long time to come to the decision to take the hormones? did you ever want to get off them? are the doctors providing the kind of support women need to make the decision to get on HRT? THanks. RC
Response:
Randi Calesa (Cal…@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
: I’ve been doing lots of research on taking HRT and I am also reading what : people write and it seems to me that the women taking the hormones seem : to be happy and feel great. I wonder, did it take you guys a long time : to come to the decision to take the hormones? did you ever want to get : off them? are the doctors providing the kind of support women need to : make the decision to get on HRT? THanks. RC You may want to wait until Dr. Susan Love’s new book on HRT comes out in Feb 97 before you make your decision. Apparently most women only take them for 3-4 years for various reasons. It must be not all that wonderful in the long haul. Besides if all you are interested in is "feeling good," then why not take "natural progesterone" instead of HRT. That is the most enthusiastic camp of "feel gooders" for my vote. Keep reading and you will hear many women unhappy with the Provera part of HRT, while unopposed estrogen seems to be highly problematic. I wonder if you got a chance to read "The Menopause Industry" yet. Sounds like a lot of your questions could be answered in that book. Please read all the fine print on the product inserts that come with the pills before you make your decision. Weigh what you are looking for to control. If you just can’t deal with the hot flashes or the vaginal atrophy, then you may have an efficacious short-term use product as long as you fully understand what the product insert is telling you regarding risks. But if all you want is to "feel great like all the other women who take HRT," I suggest you keep investigating further. Some people can feel great with alcohol, Valium, or a box of chocolate. IMHO, that is pretty subjective criteria to use before putting dangerous chemicals in your body. Read the product inserts! And keep reading the posts. Many here taking various forms of hormones or BCP’s are still having problems. And those of us who do not take anything feel pretty great too, plus are saving a lot of money and worry as well. Joan
Response:
ka…@wordwrite.com wrote:
: Joan Livingston (joan…@rain.org) wrote: : : Besides if all you are : : interested in is "feeling good," then why not take "natural progesterone" : : instead of HRT. : : Natural progesterone *is* HRT. : Karen Good point. When I use HRT I refer to the estrogen/Provera combination versus ERT which is the estrogen replacement only. And I have learned from this group to distinguish the Provera progesterone from the "natural yam/soy progesetrones." Yes, they are all "HRT" in a looser sense. I will watch this imprecise definition in the future. It could be confusing. Thanks. My distinction separates the tradition hormone replacement which it appears from this group’s discussion that most MDs are familiar with which is the horse urine or estradiol estrogen/Provera. And I gather from this group’s discussions that the "natural yam/soy progesterone" replacement is viewed by the MD’s as less traditional. Although, I also gather from this group that this attitude is changing. And then there is my approach which is to question the point of "replacing" estrogen and progesterone in the first place since they are fundamentally fertility hormones. We did not "replace" them when we did not have them pre-puberty and I question whether there is an -automatic- need to "replace" them when we pass out of our reproductive years. I continue to question the methodology and efficacy of "studies" that "prove" these are needed to be artificially replaced in the naturally menopausal women. I question if more specific and localized "treatment" of "symptoms" during this time are not also more efficacious recommendations. (ie. depression is treated as depression, and not merely as a female hormone problem.) Surgically induced menopause is an entirely different matter. That was not a "natural" transition that allowed the body to go through an adaptive process from the change from its reproductive state to its non-reproductive state. Joan
Response:
In article <564r9k$…@news.rain.org
, joan…@rain.org (Joan Livingston) wrote: …. this group’s discussions that the "natural yam/soy progesterone" ….
I no longer think that wild yam is natural progesterone, although I did at first. From a post in this group: From _What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Menopause: the Breakthrough Book on Natural Progsterone_ by John R. Lee, M.D. with Virginia Hopkins, Warner Books, Inc. 1996 Copywritten material follows: One word of caution: Not all products with labels claiming "wild yam extract" actually contain any progesterone. … Progesterone is obtained by extracting specific components from plants (e.g. diosgenin from wild yams or soybeans) and then converting them to actual progesterone in the laboratory. Progesterone (U.S. Pharmacopeia) is available on the wholesale pharmaceutical market. It is used by the major pharmaceutical companies as the base from which they synthesize their estrogen, testosterone, cortisone, and of course, their progestin products. …there is no evidence that the human body converts diosgenin to hormones. pp 269-270 Any spelling errors or typos are mine. dn – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Paul Anacker <xtraby…@fishnet.net
wrote: I’m sorry if this rain’s on the parade of a lot of the MLM companies that are promoting Mexican Wild Yam (Dioscorea) cream, but I thought people (women) should know about it’s efficacy before spending their money or getting involved in a "Get Rich Quick" scheme. I would like to hear from women who have used Natural Progesterone cream that worked for them. Please email me the following info: Brand Cost Size % Progesterone Place of Purchase —– —- —- ————– —————– Sincerely, Paul Anacker, JD Lead Editor "Biological Aging Measurement" by Ward Dean, MD ====The Report=========================================== Natural Progesterone and Yam Extract The following has been composed to help clear up confusion over the efficacy of Yam extract (Discorea Villosa) and Natural Progesterone.
We have received many letters from women who are suffering due to the fact that they have not responded to a variety of traditional treatments. Complicating matters is the fact that some companies in the U. S., are claiming or implying that their products contain Natural Progesterone, when, in fact, an examination of their ingredients reveals that they only contain Yam extract. All of the research that we have reviewed on Progesterone demonstrates that it is supplemental Natural Progesterone that will produce an increase in serum levels of progesterone, not Yam extract. (It is important to note that Yam contains plant saponins that have been shown to promote good health. However, what is at issue are serum progesterone levels.) – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Additionally, a reputable hormone testing facility in the United States has stated that supplemental natural progesterone cream has been shown to raise serum progesterone levels and that they have never observed an increase in serum progesterone from Yam extract supplementation alone! As a further disservice to the women who suffer with the symptoms brought on by "estrogen dominance" some company representatives will tell you that Yam extract (diosgenin) is molecularly the same as Natural Progesterone and that users of their "progesterone cream" will find the same benefit as they would with a cream that really contains USP Natural Progesterone. The current published research and clinical experience do not support that claim.* ——————————————————————– *A current review of the Med-Line Database (4/10/96) revealed more than 5,000 published studies completed on "Progesterone" since 1993. (k=progesterone)
(end of report. back to JL.)
… Surgically induced menopause is an entirely different matter. ….
Maybe. And maybe menopause is menopause, regardless of how it comes about. I know that both my mother, who had surgically induced menopause in her forties, and myself, who is about to reach a menopause which is natural (in my fifties), experience(d) night sweats but *not* daytime hot flashes. This is apparently less common than the reverse. Again, the program I use wouldn’t let me post because it said I had too much included text, so I have made it look as if I wrote stuff in the middle that I in fact didn’t write. Cathe (Browman)
Response:
In article <564r9k$…@news.rain.org
, joan…@rain.org (Joan Livingston)
writes:
Surgically induced menopause is an entirely different matter. That was not a "natural" transition that allowed the body to go through an adaptive process from the change from its reproductive state to its non-reproductive state. Joan
Ah, but Joan, if the lack of hormones is the ultimate proper state of being for a mature woman, why supplement after oophorectomy? At what point would you recommend dropping the HRT after surgically induced menopause? Since it is not a natural transition, perhaps one has permission to continue until whenever?
And if I feel sick when I stop the medicine or start to taper it off, does that mean I’m an addict who needs to be cured or a sick person who needs HRT to feel normal? Cheryl Ni…@AOL.com (Cheryl A. Snider)
Response:
ka…@wordwrite.com wrote:
: : But doesn’t it seem strange to you that when women *do* take hormones : that depression disappears? : Karen Some do, some don’t. According to anecdote, as well as studies. I am just repeating what a MD psychiatrist said yesterday in a course on depression for nurses CEU and general public. That they are finding it does not manage cases of depression as well as originally thought. Now this could well mean the more severe cases of depression rather than milder ones. He did say that he felt menopausal depression was one of the more easily treatable depression so since estrogen is a recognized euphoric for some reasons not yet identified biochemically with any precision, estrogen may be adequate for some women, if they want this approach. And of course there is our good friend the placebo as well which can "cure" just about anything. I will try to track down more info on this from UCLA where work is being done on this very issue. Also done at Baylor. Any Texas gals out there to find out what they are doing on estrogens and depression at Baylor? I guess my only caution is that if one has serious depression -and symptoms, according to this course, go well beyond just feeling blue or a little sad, then it may be more appropriate to treat it with the modalities specifically researched in psychotherapy and psychologically specific medications for depression. But, who else remembers the good old "frontal lobotomy" used back in the 50’s. This is my only remembrance of my mother and her friends talking about these things at maybe the peri-stages of their lives, but actually it was earlier ages than that for them, but who I realize now were suffering from that suburban disease with no name Betty Friedan wrote about in "The Feminine Mystique", which most likely was depression. They would talk about being afraid to go to one of the two women’s doctors in town because he always recommended frontal lobotomies for "hysterical women." No wonder many of our mothers didn’t talk much about menopause. Does anyone else have these frontal lobotomy stories? One woman friend of my parents who was very suicidal at that time did get one and it did cure her of her suicidal problems. She did get happier, put on weight and stopped being an obsessive housekeeper. She is still alive in her 80’s and happy and really quite normal from all appearances. What a story. But then before drugs and current non-drug therapies, there was just shock treatment and these lobotomies for the woman in distress. I guess I have to give -some- credit to the advance of science in this area.
Joan
Response:
Joan – this is offtopic but – I’ve never met anyone with a frontal lobotomy. Could she speak rationally and act/function normally? Thanks – dn joan…@rain.org (Joan Livingston) wrote:
snip – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Does anyone else have these frontal lobotomy stories? One woman friend of my parents who was very suicidal at that time did get one and it did cure her of her suicidal problems. She did get happier, put on weight and stopped being an obsessive housekeeper. She is still alive in her 80’s and happy and really quite normal from all appearances. What a story. But then before drugs and current non-drug therapies, there was just shock treatment and these lobotomies for the woman in distress. I guess I have to give -some- credit to the advance of science in this area.
Joan
Response:
This is fascinating – I didn’t know that estrogens and depression had been sufficiently explored. (Love the serotonin connection!) But I do know the Wyeth-Ayerst insert says estrogens don’t affect depression (!?!) and have actually read books by nice young people trying to explain that it’s really "just" the lack of sleep that’s bumming you out. So this is confusing to me – on one hand it seems that mainstream medicine is only waking up to the connection and on the other you report that they’re getting away from it. Wonder if this reflects fads in different specialties. As I said before, I thought there was a new renaissance in the estrogens/depression work. joan…@rain.org (Joan Livingston) wrote:
According to anecdote, as well as studies. I am just repeating what a MD psychiatrist said yesterday in a course on depression for nurses CEU and general public. That they are finding it does not manage cases of depression as well as originally thought.
Hmm – originally thought when? If in the ’50’s, that’s one thing, if in the ’80’s another. The ’80’s seemed to be when the most denial of a connection was being voiced – IMO. Now this
could well mean the more severe cases of depression rather than milder ones. He did say that he felt menopausal depression was one of the more easily treatable depression so since estrogen is a recognized euphoric for some reasons not yet identified biochemically
he doesn’t go at least part way with the serotinin connection?
with any precision, estrogen may be adequate for some women, if they want this approach.
Very interesting!! Now why can’t I find a doc like this!! He’s in California? What’s his name? I really would like to know. Thanks! snip
I guess my only caution is that if one has serious depression -and symptoms, according to this course, go well beyond just feeling blue or a little sad, then it may be more appropriate to treat it with the modalities specifically researched in psychotherapy and psychologically specific medications for depression.
I think we’ve run around this before – my sense is that the antidepressants don’t work as well *for me* and have too many strange side-effects. With *adequate* estrogens I feel fine – don’t need the antidepressants, don’t have diarrhea, blurred vision, muscle cramping (except for the Premarin leg cramps and who’s doing Premarin now anyway?), weird tastes in my mouth, odd sleep cycles, etc. Works great! But of course we’re talking about the *source* of the problem – there are depressions where the antidepressants are indicated. Interesting that the MD was acknowledging this. Who is he? Thanks again, dn – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Joan
Response:
my thanks to those of you who responded to my posts about surgical hysterectomy and HRT. Thanks also for the site links provided. I appreciate the time taken to respond and found the information useful. Since the GYNO removed everything (total recondition as my husband puts it – good for another 100,000 miles) I will probably need to do something about the hormone stuff (no ovaries left), but prefer to go the natural route if at all possible. Again, my thanks to you all. Peace to you all this holiday season, Vampyra web: http://www.vampyra.com web: http://www.bytesbydesign.net —————————- I have seen the truth and it makes absolutely no sense. ———————————-
Response:
Vampyra <vampyra-by…@home.com
wrote in message
news:RSaa4.14574$Px5.292832@news1.rdc1.ab.home.com…
my thanks to those of you who responded to my posts about surgical hysterectomy and HRT. Thanks also for the site links provided. I appreciate the time taken to respond and found the information useful. Since the GYNO removed everything (total recondition as my husband puts it – good for another 100,000 miles) I will probably need to do something about the hormone stuff (no ovaries left), but prefer to go the natural route if at all possible.
Vampyra, Not to be contrary or try to stir up trouble, but a genuine question here. What exactly do you mean by "go the natural route"?? Three years ago when I had surgical menopause, "natural" meant the estradiol patch. Now it can mean any number of things –including the ingestion of soy and fennel seed. If you think about it, there is nothing "natural" at all about our physical situation after surgery, or about whatever we choose to supplement ourselves with. I wish you well, Kalli – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Again, my thanks to you all. Peace to you all this holiday season, Vampyra web: http://www.vampyra.com web: http://www.bytesbydesign.net —————————- I have seen the truth and it makes absolutely no sense. ———————————-
Response:
Kalli: natural as in "homeopathic" and/or herbal medicines as opposed to synthetic/chemical type drugs. I know there are herbal/plant estrogens available that can be as effective as the MD prescribed types, ie Premarin, etc and I prefer to avoid those if at all possible. Vampyra "Kalli" <kalli…@worldnet.att.net
wrote in message
news:84bj30$dit$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net… | Vampyra, Not to be contrary or try to stir up trouble, but a genuine | question here. What exactly do you mean by "go the natural route"?? | | | I wish you well, | Kalli |
Response:
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 01:58:21 GMT, "Vampyra" <vampyra-by…@home.com
wrote:
Kalli: natural as in "homeopathic" and/or herbal medicines as opposed to synthetic/chemical type drugs. I know there are herbal/plant estrogens available that can be as effective as the MD prescribed types, ie Premarin, etc and I prefer to avoid those if at all possible. Vampyra
You need to do some more research. The efficacy of phytoestrogens and other herbals remains to be shown. Homeopathy is a scam. So-called "natural" estrogens like forms of estradiol and estriol and natural progesterone like promterium are *prescription* drugs which have been synthesized in a lab from plant sources. Given your history of widespread endometriosis you might wish to avoid estrogen of any kind for a time. Terri – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
"Kalli" <kalli…@worldnet.att.net wrote in message news:84bj30$dit$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net… | Vampyra, Not to be contrary or try to stir up trouble, but a genuine | question here. What exactly do you mean by "go the natural route"?? | | | I wish you well, | Kalli |
Response:
Hi, I’m new at all this posting/discussing etc. menopause. However I’m having a very bad time with the change. I’ve been on the HRT for 6 yrs now and can’t seem to find any other comfortable alternative. I was always thin, happy, an active. My weight has ballooned to 45 lbs+ causing a painful foot condition called plantar faciaitis. I used to walk 5 mi daily can’t do that with the foot problem, it can only resolve itself,but that’s unlikely when I’m on my feet constantly at work. My Dr. doesn’t really seem to care. I’ve been depressed with the bloating and have no desire to join my friends in any activities. I want to say thank you to Gina Marie for the previous post. Everyone has different theories on herbs vs. HRT, when you feel desperate I guess we try anything. I have found these postings most interesting and can’t drag myself away. I finally feel like there are others out there like me hot,sweaty,and depressed searching for that "new wonderful woman" feeling we’re supposed to have when we start this new passage in our lives.
Response:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 14:06:53 -0500 (EST), Wite-D…@webtv.net (Snookie) wrote: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Hi, I’m new at all this posting/discussing etc. menopause. However I’m having a very bad time with the change. I’ve been on the HRT for 6 yrs now and can’t seem to find any other comfortable alternative. I was always thin, happy, an active. My weight has ballooned to 45 lbs+ causing a painful foot condition called plantar faciaitis. I used to walk 5 mi daily can’t do that with the foot problem, it can only resolve itself,but that’s unlikely when I’m on my feet constantly at work. My Dr. doesn’t really seem to care. I’ve been depressed with the bloating and have no desire to join my friends in any activities. I want to say thank you to Gina Marie for the previous post. Everyone has different theories on herbs vs. HRT, when you feel desperate I guess we try anything. I have found these postings most interesting and can’t drag myself away. I finally feel like there are others out there like me hot,sweaty,and depressed searching for that "new wonderful woman" feeling we’re supposed to have when we start this new passage in our lives.
Many women find that detoxifying from hormones takes a very long time. I only took prempro for 6 weeks, and it took my body almost a year to recover from it. The simplistic assumption that taking hormones will allow the process of menopause to continue while it relieves uncomfortable symptoms is not borne out by the experience of many women. It seems that hormone use, especially in the perimenopausal period, disrupts the process for many women and may postpone the symptoms but once you stop the pills the symptoms come back, sometimes with a vengeance. Some drug companies are now recognizing this in their ads, with the statement that symptoms "may return when the drug is stopped." How old are you and at what point in your menopausal journey did you start taking hormones? Terri
Response:
Elleste Duet is a monthly bleed estradiol/progesterone script by Searle Pharmacuetical. Elleste Solo is strickly progesterone for women who had a hyterectomy. In article <84hr6v$jq…@news5.svr.pol.co.uk
,
"john close" <j…@closej.freeserve.co.uk
wrote:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Hi. I am 49 years old and am just starting showing all the classical
menopause
symptoms. I had a really heavy bleed and my blood count went so low I
almost
had to have a transfusion.This really frightened me and I now get
really
anxious every time I bleed. My Doctor tries to convince me to go on
HRT, but
I do not like the thought of taking pills every day for goodness knows
how
long. The pills I have been perscribed are called Elleste Duet, does anyone
have
any information about these or in fact any helpful observations about
the
menopause. Regards, Yvonne. weddi…@closej.freeserve.co.uk
— Brenda Moran, Managing Editor, The GameMasterOnline http://www.GameMasterOnline.com The Best Source of Gaming Info & it’s FREE! Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
Response:
john close wrote in message <84hr6v$jq…@news5.svr.pol.co.uk
… Hi. I am 49 years old and am just starting showing all the classical menopause symptoms. I had a really heavy bleed and my blood count went so low I
almost
had to have a transfusion.
Did this happen from just one session of bleeding? How low was your blood count? And what deteremined that you would need a transfusion. This sounds extremely serious ….and unusual. This goes well beyond "just menopause." I hope your doctor is giving you a very thorough diagnositc work-up. Also there are reports that alcohol use during one’s periods can trigger a flood …but not to level of needing a transfusion. What about other areas of stress, helplessness, hopelessness that may also be going on in your life now or in the recent past? Do you have problems with your gums spontaneously bleeding too? Lots of questions here, but this is how we learn together. No need to answer them in public but you may want to discuss them with your MD, and watch any alcohol use during this time. J This really frightened me and I now get really – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
anxious every time I bleed. My Doctor tries to convince me to go on HRT,
but
I do not like the thought of taking pills every day for goodness knows how long. The pills I have been perscribed are called Elleste Duet, does anyone have any information about these or in fact any helpful observations about the menopause. Regards, Yvonne. weddi…@closej.freeserve.co.uk
Response:
Hi. I am 49 years old and am just starting showing all the classical menopause symptoms. I had a really heavy bleed and my blood count went so low I almost had to have a transfusion.This really frightened me and I now get really anxious every time I bleed. My Doctor tries to convince me to go on HRT, but I do not like the thought of taking pills every day for goodness knows how long. The pills I have been perscribed are called Elleste Duet, does anyone have any information about these or in fact any helpful observations about the menopause. Regards, Yvonne. weddi…@closej.freeserve.co.uk
Response:
Yvonne wrote:
[snip story of scary heavy bleed]
The pills I have been perscribed are called Elleste Duet, does anyone have any information about these or in fact any helpful observations about the menopause.
Hi, Yvonne, and welcome to alt.support.menopause. A number of us have had the scary bleeding. I have a personal history at the first URL on my signature file, and there’s more information on Menopause & Beyond. I don’t know what Elleste Duet is, but it sounds like a combination estrogen/progesterone pill to me. Regards, Laura Blanchard lblanch…@aol.com http://members.aol.com/lblanch000/ http://members.tripod.com/menopause/ (Land o’Links –click the cormorant for Menopause & Beyond)
Response:
Karen Kay wrote:
Lblanch000 <lblanch…@aol.com wrote: Oy. So far, I’ve kept all my sites banner-free, and I hope to keep it that way. Although we do, every now and again, toy with the idea of setting up an associates program with Amazon. Please, please, please, please, please don’t do this. — Karen
Why not? I’ve done it. It hasn’t hurt me any. I’m certainly not getting rich, but it hasn’t been a problem… …geminiwalker — To learn more about me, go to http://home.earthlink.net/~chuard
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -droz…@home.com wrote:
On 30 Dec 1999 19:19:29 GMT, lblanch…@aol.com (Lblanch000) wrote: Karen, I understand your position. In this case, though, the small independent bookdealer we’d be undercutting is our own sales office, staffed by overextended volunteers who would dearly love to quit and keep packing those boxes out of a weary sense of loyalty. Much easier to let Amazon do the work for us and just collect a cut. It’s not, repeat *not* in competition with a local bookseller. Just us, and we’d like to be out of the retail business. Regards, Laura Blanchard lblanch…@aol.com http://members.aol.com/lblanch000/ http://members.tripod.com/menopause/ (Land o’Links –click the cormorant for Menopause & Beyond) Go over to amazon and look up some of your favourite books. Take a look at the books selected as " people who read this also read…." They haven’t a clue and don’t care how they promote the books as long as they sell. So it depends on how you value the reputation of your product. JMO. Kathryn droz…@home.com
I like that feature. It has led me on some fascinating journeys to discover similar authors and books that take me just a little bit further with where I am going with my reading and research… …geminiwalker — To learn more about me, go to http://home.earthlink.net/~chuard
Response:
On 30 Dec 1999 19:19:29 GMT, lblanch…@aol.com (Lblanch000) wrote:
Karen, I understand your position. In this case, though, the small independent bookdealer we’d be undercutting is our own sales office, staffed by overextended volunteers who would dearly love to quit and keep packing those boxes out of a weary sense of loyalty. Much easier to let Amazon do the work for us and just collect a cut. It’s not, repeat *not* in competition with a local bookseller. Just us, and we’d like to be out of the retail business. Regards, Laura Blanchard lblanch…@aol.com http://members.aol.com/lblanch000/ http://members.tripod.com/menopause/ (Land o’Links –click the cormorant for Menopause & Beyond)
Go over to amazon and look up some of your favourite books. Take a look at the books selected as " people who read this also read…." They haven’t a clue and don’t care how they promote the books as long as they sell. So it depends on how you value the reputation of your product. JMO. Kathryn droz…@home.com
Response:
I’m following my own post because I don’t want to spread a misconception. When I wrote:
Although we do, every now and again, toy with the idea of setting up an associates program with Amazon.
I was *not* thinking of Land o’Links, but of another site I maintain for a nonprofit. Regards, Laura Blanchard lblanch…@aol.com http://members.aol.com/lblanch000/ http://members.tripod.com/menopause/ (Land o’Links –click the cormorant for Menopause & Beyond)
Response:
I wrote, re another nonprofit site I manage, and Karen responds:
Lblanch000 <lblanch…@aol.com wrote: Oy. So far, I’ve kept all my sites banner-free, and I hope to keep it that way. Although we do, every now and again, toy with the idea of setting up an associates program with Amazon. Please, please, please, please, please don’t do this.
Karen, I understand your position. In this case, though, the small independent bookdealer we’d be undercutting is our own sales office, staffed by overextended volunteers who would dearly love to quit and keep packing those boxes out of a weary sense of loyalty. Much easier to let Amazon do the work for us and just collect a cut. It’s not, repeat *not* in competition with a local bookseller. Just us, and we’d like to be out of the retail business. Regards, Laura Blanchard lblanch…@aol.com http://members.aol.com/lblanch000/ http://members.tripod.com/menopause/ (Land o’Links –click the cormorant for Menopause & Beyond)
Response:
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999 01:11:50 GMT, vl-hb…@erols.com (Terri) wrote:
Chinese herbalists are not homeopaths. Chinese herbs (or any other kind) may well contain active ingredients which may indeed have an effect on various health problems.
…not necessarily the expected ones either… Extract from http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/alt/china_warn.htm Warning: Chinese Medicinal Formulas There are many different brands of Chinese medicinal formulas and, as with medicinal herbs, care should be taken with purchasing. Incorrectly labeled products and/or the presence of contaminants, adulterations, or substitutions have all been reported in conjunction with Chinese medicinal formulas. Contaminants such as heavy metals and/or substitutions with pharmaceutical drugs (over the counter and prescription) are a serious health hazard.
Response:
MARIE10502 wrote:
as far as menopause or other *non treatening* conditions, herbalists back then, and still are using ancient therapy that has worked for years.
But are they good for someone with endometriosis? Cool Runnings, HomemakerJ
Response:
Kathryn says:
Is menopause information an industry or what? Let’s develop an asm non profit society and split any proceeds. How many bannars will fit on the Land O’Links Laura?
Oy. So far, I’ve kept all my sites banner-free, and I hope to keep it that way. Although we do, every now and again, toy with the idea of setting up an associates program with Amazon. Regards, Laura Blanchard lblanch…@aol.com http://members.aol.com/lblanch000/ http://members.tripod.com/menopause/ (Land o’Links –click the cormorant for Menopause & Beyond)
Response:
On 29 Dec 1999 15:44:50 GMT, marie10…@aol.com (MARIE10502) wrote:
Good luck to you, and remember, listen to your body
Also remember that your brain is part of your body;-) Tishy
Response:
On 29 Dec 1999 15:44:50 GMT, marie10…@aol.com (MARIE10502) wrote:
The truth be known, I would like to avoid any kind of HRT if possible. Thanks for the tip Terri… will do some more research. Vampyra, Do what you think is best for "you" Terri calling homepathy a scam is her opinion, and the opinion of some doctors. Obviously not the opinion of homepathic doctors
Ever known a scammer who was willing to admit that s/he was perpetrating a scam? Many homeopaths actually believe that their therapy provides a benefit to the patient. That doesn’t make it true either. Over and over, scientific studies show that homeopathy is worthless. That’s good enough for me. Of course it may have a placebo effect, but one can probably get that for a lot less money and without the middleman.
or chinese herbalists.
Chinese herbalists are not homeopaths. Chinese herbs (or any other kind) may well contain active ingredients which may indeed have an effect on various health problems.
Whom have gained much reconizition and respect over the past years. I’ve researched till I’m blue in the face and you know what? I find good arguments to back both sides up. As far as scientific studies, only a few have been done on the pharmaceutical side and the jury is still out on that! Not enough information on either side, scientifically, is available to support one side or the other. bottom line is, it’s your body. Do what your intuition tells you to do.
Intuition is not the opposite of intelligence. Your brain is your most important resource in deciding what’s good for you. Terri – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Problem today is women don’t listen to our own unique intuition anymore, instead we rely on doctors who know nothing more than what they learn in out dated text books. The good ones learn from their patients. My advice to you would be if you do choose natural, (herbs etc) go to a professional. Like a homepathcih doctor. Remember, all drugs were derived from some natural component to begin with. Like plants and herbs. Then formulated so that they could be patented. Herbs are unregulated drugs. Go to a professional who has knowledge in the use of them. Here is an address for you to check out if you are truly interested in alternative treatments. American Menopause Foundation, Inc. operates a national network of support groups that deal with alternative treatments, among other issues. for information on a group in your area, or write the foundation at: Madison Square Station 350 Fifth Avenue; Suite 2822 New York, New York 10118 (212) 714-2398 You can also search the web for more information on alternative medicines. I hear there are some very good chinese herbalist/accupucture doctors around. Please don’t rule out conventional treatment either. You did say you had your ovaries removed. This may call for a more stronger, pharmaceutical drug to replace the hormones your body is no longer making. Here is another resource for you, it has a more conventional, as well as holistic and alternative approach to HRT. The North American Menopause Society [NAMS] offers a mainstream perspective on menopause treatment, with lists of suggested readings and physicians in your area specializing in menopause. Write: Post Office Box 94527 Cleveland, OH 44101 OR: University Hospital of Cleveland 11100 Euclid Ave. Cleveland OH 44106 (216) 844-8748 Fax: (216) 844-8708 E-mail NAMS Good luck to you, and remember, listen to your body. Not what others tell you. Gina Marie
Response:
MARIE10502 wrote:
(snip)
bottom line is, it’s your body. Do what your intuition tells you to do.
While this is not bad advice, I’d modify it, personally, to say: Do your homework, read up on *objective* sources (i.e., not the people who sell the product or service), and then follow your instincts. Intuition is a fine thing – but so is information. I firmly believe in taking responsibility for my own health care, but I also believe in using that responsbility wisely. Self-education can be a chore — there’s so much conflicting information out there — but it’s not an impossible one. As an aside: I was thinking just last night of the argument, often made for some "natural" treatments, that goes along the lines of "it’s an ancient therapy, known for thousands of years." My question is this: Do we have any evidence that people were actually *healthier* thousands of years ago? Everything I’ve seen says they died younger and succumbed to a lot of diseases we consider minor today. Regards, –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
On 29 Dec 1999 15:44:50 GMT, marie10…@aol.com (MARIE10502) wrote:
The truth be known, I would like to avoid any kind of HRT if possible. Thanks for the tip Terri… will do some more research. Vampyra, Do what you think is best for "you" Terri calling homepathy a scam is her opinion, and the opinion of some doctors. Obviously not the opinion of homepathic doctors or chinese herbalists.
Hmmm, to my knowledge Chinese herbology and homeopathy are two distinct disciplines. You recommend getting professional advice before using herbs, I agree, but make sure you are in the right arena first IMO.
Here is an address for you to check out if you are truly interested in alternative treatments. American Menopause Foundation, Inc. operates a national network of support groups that deal with alternative treatments, among other issues. for information on a group in your area, or write the foundation at: Madison Square Station 350 Fifth Avenue; Suite 2822 New York, New York 10118 (212) 714-2398
Or better still look at this award winning website: http://www.altmedicine.com Can you tell me just where you heard about the American Menopause Foundation Marie? I am curious. I just looked in Appendix I of Susan Love’s Hormone book and see lists of places to get information about accupuncture, naturopathy, homeopathy, herbology and more but no mention of the above foundation. Never mind, I just did a websearch. This foundation is not more nor less alternative than NAMS. Much the same in fact. For a ABC Good Morning America transcript with Marie Lugano the founder and president of the AMF on perimenopause see: http://www.abcnews.de/onair/GoodMorningAmerica/gma990303_MarieLugano_… Is menopause information an industry or what? Let’s develop an asm non profit society and split any proceeds. How many bannars will fit on the Land O’Links Laura?
You can also search the web for more information on alternative medicines. I hear there are some very good chinese herbalist/accupucture doctors around.
Yes and I doubt they dispense your typical HFS alternative therapies either, at least the good ones. For a list in BC see: http://www.acupuncture.com/Referrals/BC.htm You might read the links on Tishy’s webpage how to evaluate websites. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Please don’t rule out conventional treatment either. You did say you had your ovaries removed. This may call for a more stronger, pharmaceutical drug to replace the hormones your body is no longer making. Here is another resource for you, it has a more conventional, as well as holistic and alternative approach to HRT. The North American Menopause Society [NAMS] offers a mainstream perspective on menopause treatment, with lists of suggested readings and physicians in your area specializing in menopause. Write: Post Office Box 94527 Cleveland, OH 44101 OR: University Hospital of Cleveland 11100 Euclid Ave. Cleveland OH 44106 (216) 844-8748 Fax: (216) 844-8708 E-mail NAMS Good luck to you, and remember, listen to your body. Not what others tell you. Gina Marie
I will not stop handing out information Gina, we all have to decide what makes sense and what does not make sense. Kathryn droz…@home.com
Response:
My question is this: Do we have any evidence that people were actually *healthier* thousands of years ago? Everything I’ve seen says they died younger and succumbed to a lot of diseases we consider minor today.
This is true. And this is a subject I know something about. People died earlier back then because of infections, bacteria, unsanitary conditions, lack of medical surgical knowledge and poor nutrition in a lot of cases. We’ve had over the years the polio vacacine, TB, measles, influenze and other vacines discovered to prevent many of the ailments that killed people in the past. as far as menopause or other *non treatening* conditions, herbalists back then, and still are using ancient therapy that has worked for years. Gina Marie
Response:
The truth be known, I would like to avoid any kind of HRT if possible. Thanks for the tip Terri… will do some more research. "Terri" <vl-hb…@erols.com
wrote in message
news:386a762f.293783605@news.erols.com… | On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 01:58:21 GMT, "Vampyra" <vampyra-by…@home.com
| wrote:
| |
Kalli: natural as in "homeopathic" and/or herbal medicines
|
as opposed to synthetic/chemical type drugs. I know there
|
are herbal/plant estrogens available that can be as effective
|
as the MD prescribed types, ie Premarin, etc and I prefer
|
to avoid those if at all possible.
|
|
Vampyra
| | | You need to do some more research. The efficacy of phytoestrogens and | other herbals remains to be shown. Homeopathy is a scam. So-called | "natural" estrogens like forms of estradiol and estriol and natural | progesterone like promterium are *prescription* drugs which have been | synthesized in a lab from plant sources. Given your history of | widespread endometriosis you might wish to avoid estrogen of any kind | for a time. | | Terri | |
| >"Kalli" <kalli…@worldnet.att.net
wrote in message
|
news:84bj30$dit$1@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net…
|
| Vampyra, Not to be contrary or try to stir up trouble, but a genuine
|
| question here. What exactly do you mean by "go the natural route"??
|
|
|
| | I wish you well,
|
| Kalli
|
|
|
|
Response:
The truth be known, I would like to avoid any kind of HRT if possible. Thanks for the tip Terri… will do some more research.
Vampyra, Do what you think is best for "you" Terri calling homepathy a scam is her opinion, and the opinion of some doctors. Obviously not the opinion of homepathic doctors or chinese herbalists. Whom have gained much reconizition and respect over the past years. I’ve researched till I’m blue in the face and you know what? I find good arguments to back both sides up. As far as scientific studies, only a few have been done on the pharmaceutical side and the jury is still out on that! Not enough information on either side, scientifically, is available to support one side or the other. bottom line is, it’s your body. Do what your intuition tells you to do. Problem today is women don’t listen to our own unique intuition anymore, instead we rely on doctors who know nothing more than what they learn in out dated text books. The good ones learn from their patients. My advice to you would be if you do choose natural, (herbs etc) go to a professional. Like a homepathcih doctor. Remember, all drugs were derived from some natural component to begin with. Like plants and herbs. Then formulated so that they could be patented. Herbs are unregulated drugs. Go to a professional who has knowledge in the use of them. Here is an address for you to check out if you are truly interested in alternative treatments. American Menopause Foundation, Inc. operates a national network of support groups that deal with alternative treatments, among other issues. for information on a group in your area, or write the foundation at: Madison Square Station 350 Fifth Avenue; Suite 2822 New York, New York 10118 (212) 714-2398 You can also search the web for more information on alternative medicines. I hear there are some very good chinese herbalist/accupucture doctors around. Please don’t rule out conventional treatment either. You did say you had your ovaries removed. This may call for a more stronger, pharmaceutical drug to replace the hormones your body is no longer making. Here is another resource for you, it has a more conventional, as well as holistic and alternative approach to HRT. The North American Menopause Society [NAMS] offers a mainstream perspective on menopause treatment, with lists of suggested readings and physicians in your area specializing in menopause. Write: Post Office Box 94527 Cleveland, OH 44101 OR: University Hospital of Cleveland 11100 Euclid Ave. Cleveland OH 44106 (216) 844-8748 Fax: (216) 844-8708 E-mail NAMS Good luck to you, and remember, listen to your body. Not what others tell you. Gina Marie
Response:
I’ve been reading these posts for the last couple of weeks, since I found out that I was perimenopausal. My symptoms have been most psychological–mood swings, palpitations, anxiety, sleep problems. When I had my hormones checked, my FSH level was 42. My doctor put me on the standard HRT regimen of .65 (?)Premarin for 25 days and .5 (Provera) for 12 days. I’ve been taking the Premarin and will start the Provera in a couple of days. Most of the people of this group seem to be taking natural stuff, such as this wild yam. Has anyone just been on the ordinary regime and had any response? Preferably good? This is just the pits. I thought meno would just be a cessation of periods and some uncomfortable warm feelings. I wasn’t prepared for this emotional turmoil. And I’ve read that the Provera can cause more unpleasant symptoms. What a drag. Millie
Response:
Big DUH!!! What I meant to say was I don’t know why *Provera* was prescribed for me when I was still having periods. The Premarin was wonderful when I first started it. I was really high from the relief! It was great. Yeah, I’m with you on this, Karen! Now when you mention that you up your estrogen when you are using (larger amounts?) the progesterone, it sounds to me like you’re copying what are bodies do normally. When I got my Premarin the nurse practioner sort of whispered to me that I should experiment with the amounts a bit over the course of the month – said getting exactly the same amount of estrogens daily across the month wasn’t "natural". Hmm. I wonder if there’s a bit of this cycling even after periods are gone. I haven’t heard about it. dn (posted and e-mailed) – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -ka…@wordwrite.com wrote:
Della Noche (dno…@wco.com) wrote: : Hi! Are you still having periods? I took Provera for one 10 day set but : as I am still having periods I figured I didn’t need it. The reason I started taking HRT was *because* I was having periods. They were making me sick. : I’m not really sure what Premarin’s for when given to women who are still : menstruating. To supplement your natural hormones! Honestly, Della! What peri means is that you’re still making some of your own hormones *but not enough*. In fact, I recently upped my estrogen by a tad (this is what I like most about using a gel!) for the days that I’m taking relatively large amounts of progesterone, and that counters the uckiness of the p. nicely. — Karen ka…@wordwrite.com
Response:
Hi! Are you still having periods? I took Provera for one 10 day set but as I am still having periods I figured I didn’t need it. Yam cream has made my periods much more like they were when I was in my 20’s – easier but longer. I’m not really sure what Premarin’s for when given to women who are still menstruating. Anybody? dn – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -ymk…@aol.com (YMKAHN) wrote:
I’ve been reading these posts for the last couple of weeks, since I found out that I was perimenopausal. My symptoms have been most psychological–mood swings, palpitations, anxiety, sleep problems. When I had my hormones checked, my FSH level was 42. My doctor put me on the standard HRT regimen of .65 (?)Premarin for 25 days and .5 (Provera) for 12 days. I’ve been taking the Premarin and will start the Provera in a couple of days. Most of the people of this group seem to be taking natural stuff, such as this wild yam. Has anyone just been on the ordinary regime and had any response? Preferably good? This is just the pits. I thought meno would just be a cessation of periods and some uncomfortable warm feelings. I wasn’t prepared for this emotional turmoil. And I’ve read that the Provera can cause more unpleasant symptoms. What a drag. Millie
Response:
In article <325dd09…@news.wclynx.com
, Della Noche <dno…@wco.com wrote: …. ymk…@aol.com (YMKAHN) wrote: I’ve been reading these posts for the last couple of weeks, since I found out that I was perimenopausal. My symptoms have been most psychological–mood swings, palpitations, anxiety, sleep problems. ….
I too am perimenopausal, and am having night sweats, heart problems, joint problems, sleep problems. I went on birth control pills in July, and that took care of the worst of the sleep problems for me, although by no means all of my sleep problems. And nothing else. As a result of the bc pills, I am getting synthetic estrogen and synthetic progesterone 3 out of every 4 weeks. I think it is the supplemental estrogen that is doing something for me, because I took several forms of progesterone before that did nothing for me. Although I have tried a bunch of things, I’m not on anything "natural"–these pills were the first thing that had any effect on my symptoms. Luckily I have had no breast cancer in my family. Cathe (Browman)
Response:
Hello, I’m a menopausal woman. This was determined about 5 months ago. I went on HRT right away. I’ve only had one real period in the past 5 months. I usually have maybe a drop of blood per day when I should be having a period. Is this to be expected? I’m from Ontario, Canada. My doctor went back to Egypt. There’re no doctors taking new patients at this time. I’d appreciate hearing from someone. Thanks. Teresa
Response:
Teresa wrote:
Hello, I’m a menopausal woman. This was determined about 5 months ago. I went on HRT right away. I’ve only had one real period in the past 5 months. I usually have maybe a drop of blood per day when I should be having a period. Is this to be expected? I’m from Ontario, Canada. My doctor went back to Egypt. There’re no doctors taking new patients at this time. I’d appreciate hearing from someone. Thanks.
Hi Teresa, Welcome to a.s.m. It sounds to me as if you are perimenopausal, not menopausal. Being menopausal means that you have gone 12 months without a period, perimenopause if the period of time leading up to meno. How did you determine you were menopausal? Most of the blood tests are not accurate, because your hormonal levels are constatly changing. There are some women here who have been told they are menopausal and gone on to have periods for a number of years. I am still in peri, last period in dec, day before my 60th birthday. Now I am getting the drop or spot of blood a day type of periods, still getting lots of pms. I find the pms the worst part now. As far as the HRT goes, I don’t think it is safe and have felt that way for many years. With all the studies that have come out recently, I am even more anti-hrt. I will leave the hrt discussion to others, who are better informed on it. sue
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
From: Sue and Kevin Mullen kjmul…@comcast.net Date: 8/18/03 8:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time Teresa wrote: Hello, I’m a menopausal woman. This was determined about 5 months ago. I went on HRT right away. I’ve only had one real period in the past 5 months. I usually have maybe a drop of blood per day when I should be having a period. Is this to be expected? I’m from Ontario, Canada. My doctor went back to Egypt. There’re no doctors taking new patients at this time. I’d appreciate hearing from someone. Thanks. Hi Teresa, Welcome to a.s.m. It sounds to me as if you are perimenopausal, not menopausal. Being menopausal means that you have gone 12 months without a period, perimenopause if the period of time leading up to meno. How did you determine you were menopausal? Most of the blood tests are not accurate, because your hormonal levels are constatly changing. There are some women here who have been told they are menopausal and gone on to have periods for a number of years. I am still in peri, last period in dec, day before my 60th birthday. Now I am getting the drop or spot of blood a day type of periods, still getting lots of pms. I find the pms the worst part now. As far as the HRT goes, I don’t think it is safe and have felt that way for many years. With all the studies that have come out recently, I am even more anti-hrt. I will leave the hrt discussion to others, who are better informed on it.
I’m with Sue on this issue. Outisde of helping sometimes to alleviate some of the hot flashes,HRT has been oversold by drug companies out to make a profit. HRT is most dangerous as far as risk of blood clots and heart attacks within the first year.Long term it increases the risk of breast cancer. What is your reasoning for taking HRT? Sharon…………A warm toll-house cookie is an experience not unlike a religious epiphany.
Response:
"Teresa" <art…@porchlight.ca
wrote in
news:FoXZa.385$CU1.23894@localhost:
Hello, I’m a menopausal woman. This was determined about 5 months ago. I went on HRT right away. I’ve only had one real period in the past 5 months. I usually have maybe a drop of blood per day when I should be having a period. Is this to be expected? I’m from Ontario, Canada. My doctor went back to Egypt. There’re no doctors taking new patients at this time. I’d appreciate hearing from someone. Thanks.
Hi, Teresa, welcome to asm. You don’t mention why you went on HRT. Were you having insufferable disruptions of your life from menopausal conditions? Or was it just another case of the doctor dictating to the patient? Unusual (not to say bizarre) periods are a hallmark of peri, but if you’re intact (no hysterectomy) you should be having periods, at least a few each year, while you’re on HRT. You really need to see a doctor about this, I think. Nothing you describe is particularly alarming, but you’re taking powerful drugs, and you are no longer under medical supervision. I can’t believe there is no doctor in Ontario who could see you; but then, I don’t know anything about the Canadian health system, except that it’s better than ours (USA) overall.
HTH, Chakolate
Response:
Moses was a mystic. All of the prophets were mystics. Believe it or not, there are quite a few PEOPLE THAT THINK THEY ARE MYSTICS! Today, Karen, Tishy and of course soul sista Laura with her wild and wooley web page for ugly women think they are mystics, but are not. They think that mysticism is a belief that direct knowledge that HRT is a POISON This is not true! HRT is attainable through immediate intuition or insight with the help of a a well written prescription for your doctor. Off shore pharmacies differ from ordinary pharmacies, usually you don’t need a script to get the POISON.The mystic is one who has mystical (spiritual) experiences, such as eliminating Hot Flashes, mood swings, and other menopausal related symtons. She hears the voice of Lauren Hutton speak to her. Sometimes it seems to be a voice far outside herself, like the voice that spoke to Moses from the burning bush. More often it is a still,small voice that speaks within the heart and the well educated mind, USE HRT and feel better! This was brought to you by chits and giggles!
Response:
What is a mystic? This is not areal treatment for menopuase is it? I don’t understand this message. Sue
Response:
In article <20010714124529.08429.00004…@ng-cj1.news.cs.com
,
DimpledCheeks2 <dimpledchee…@cs.com
wrote: What is a mystic? This is not areal treatment for menopuase is it? I don’t understand this message.
Don’t worry about it, Sue. This news group has been visited recently by a weirdo who likes to use other people’s screen names to post inflammatory nonsense. It happens sometimes – one of the side effects of the freedom of the Internet is that even idiots can say what they want. –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
This is the real FurPaw speaking. The message you’re referring to was written by an unwelcome visitor to this group, a person who pops into newsgroups and tries to stir up controversy, and then sits back and enjoys the furor. These visitors are usually teen-aged boys or people with an equivalent immature adolescent mentality. There’s nothing anyone can do about these folks except ignore their ‘presence’. A mystic is someone who believes that there is hidden meaning in life, and that through various spiritual practices, they can get in touch with the supernatural. I suppose that mysticism could be used in the treatment of problems arising in menopause, but it’s not a practice that is commonly discussed in this newsgroup. We’re more likely to discuss down-to-earth ways of coping, handling or treating these problems. He probably spoofed me with the mystic reference because I often recommend meditation as a means of reducing stress. FurPaw – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -DimpledCheeks2 wrote:
What is a mystic? This is not areal treatment for menopuase is it? I don’t understand this message. Sue
Response:
#$&**#&@#!!#@@@ I failed to notice the email address that I was responding to! FurPaw – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -FurPaw wrote:
This is the real FurPaw speaking. The message you’re referring to was written by an unwelcome visitor to this group, a person who pops into newsgroups and tries to stir up controversy, and then sits back and enjoys the furor. These visitors are usually teen-aged boys or people with an equivalent immature adolescent mentality. There’s nothing anyone can do about these folks except ignore their ‘presence’. A mystic is someone who believes that there is hidden meaning in life, and that through various spiritual practices, they can get in touch with the supernatural. I suppose that mysticism could be used in the treatment of problems arising in menopause, but it’s not a practice that is commonly discussed in this newsgroup. We’re more likely to discuss down-to-earth ways of coping, handling or treating these problems. He probably spoofed me with the mystic reference because I often recommend meditation as a means of reducing stress. FurPaw DimpledCheeks2 wrote: What is a mystic? This is not areal treatment for menopuase is it? I don’t understand this message. Sue
Response:
He probably spoofed me with the mystic reference because I often recommend meditation as a means of reducing stress. FurPaw
DONT GIVE YOURSELF SO MUCH CREDIT! THOSE WORDS WERE REARRANGED FROM ANOTHERS STUPID HYPERLINK. MOSES WAS A MYSTIC. RMTFLMFAOATSFDMB. HOT FLASH HATTIE
Response:
#$&**#&@#!!#@@@ I failed to notice the email address that I was responding to! FurPaw
You cant help the fact that Sue is not all there. you have a fowl mouth. !$@!$@!$@ ^*&^%$#$#@@@!!!! &&^%$##@@!!!!
Response:
HAbadzi (HABA…@worldbank.org) wrote:
: If you get the advice everyone in this group gave you to live without : estrogen, you will age very visibly, like your ancestors. If you need : to keep an appearance of youth and health, hormone supplementation is : necessary. This is simply not true. Even the hormone drug product inserts warn that estrogens will NOT keep you young, make you look young, etc. It’s not only a myth, but a dangerous one and difficult to eradicate since it is based on deeply inculcated cultural values. All I can say is that I take absolutely no hormones and am constantly asked what drugs I take to "look so young." I just do 2 things: eat a low fat diet and exercise daily (aerobic and weight lifting). -GG : I want to see research to DEALY or stop menopause, but for some reason : no one is interested! They prefer to let women lose their hormones and : then supplement them pharmaceutically!! Hummm, wonder why? Could it be the horrible side effects and cancer risk??? -G
Response:
On Wed, 06 May 1998 11:28:33 -0400, in alt.support.menopause you wrote:
If you get the advice everyone in this group gave you to live without estrogen, you will age very visibly, like your ancestors.
Unwarranted assumption and of no consequence to many.
If you need to keep an appearance of youth and health, hormone supplementation is necessary.
Further sweeping statement
But apparently
Apparent to whom? Does this validate the concept for everybody? "Apparently" holds within itself the possibility of this being false.
many benefits come from progesterone, not estrogen. Read "What your doctor may not tell you about menopause" by John R. Lee.
Also read reviews of this book accessible through http://www.oxford.net/~tishy/booktabl.html
Buy "natural" progesterone cream, (better pharmaceutically compounded throught a prescription at the International Women’s Pharmacy).
While consistently disagreeing with your views, I have never before believed you to be engaged in commercial advertising. As Karen has just said to somebody else, do not prescribe for others.
It apparently keeps bones at least in good shape.
Again "apparent". To read the views of those to whom it is *not* apparent, go to http://www.oxford.net/~tishy/mlm.html
And you may take tri-est with it, estriol-estrone-estrogen. It’s much safer than the premarin stuff on your breasts.
Repeated requests for back-up cites for this claim have never borne fruit. Can *you* justify it?
I want to see research to DEALY or stop menopause, but for some reason no one is interested! They prefer to let women lose their hormones and then supplement them pharmaceutically!!
For pharmaceutical companies to take this attitude (if in fact they do) is reasonable in the light of their profit motive. Most *women* do not prefer to supplement hormones. There are multiple invisible advantages to the postmenopausal state, which I am happy to trade for the cosmetic advantages of earlier life. Pat (Crone) http://www.oxford.net/~tishy includes unoffical asm website newbies entrance, men’s entrance, "soapbox", physical and nonphysical aspects of meno, how to evaluate info, links to other meno and medical sites, Men-o-Pause story., direct link to dejanews (current asm and filter)
Response:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 ardan…@inreach.com wrote:
Dear Bonnie, Estrogen in some form, in any form helps "Crashing Fatigue" right away, Within a week you will feel better and the hot flashes will stop. Brain fog takes awhile depending on your stress level.. You will feel better though never the same as before meno. This is what happened to me..you might discover new feelings for yourself. I’ve been doing this for 3 years… Good luck, Wendy Ardans
You can relate your own experience after a surgical menopause with an estrogen drug, but there is no way you can state so conclusively that this is the experience which all women post surgical menopause can expect with this drug. Or else you have simply been not listening to the many stories to the contrary right here on this newsgroup about the far less than successful experiences with this drug product. Read the FDA product label for estrogen drugs if you wish to experiment with them like Wendy for off-label uses. Read the growing literature that warns about uses over 5-10 years. Be sure to understand that estrogen -replacement- post surgically, is not interchangable with HRT with progesterone for those who still have a uterus. And by all means realize that the use of hormone drugs for the non-surgical menopause may make it troublesome when you decide to stop their use …60% of women have some sort of rebound symptoms. If some one wants a "pick-me-up" drug or energy booster, why not just ask your doctor to prescribe amphetamines. At least you are staying on label. Hormone drugs are not brain candy. shelly
Response:
HAbadzi (HABA…@worldbank.org) wrote: : If you get the advice everyone in this group gave you to live without : estrogen, you will age very visibly, like your ancestors. If you need : to keep an appearance of youth and health, hormone supplementation is : necessary.
This is a total crock. I look around me and I see my friends on hormone drugs with strokes, one breast, melanoma and one I don’t see at all because she died at age 46 …from a stroke after Premarin use. No one I know looks "younger" on hormone drugs. You are living in fantasy land. Take your drug scam elsewhere. shelly – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
This is simply not true. Even the hormone drug product inserts warn that estrogens will NOT keep you young, make you look young, etc. It’s not only a myth, but a dangerous one and difficult to eradicate since it is based on deeply inculcated cultural values. All I can say is that I take absolutely no hormones and am constantly asked what drugs I take to "look so young." I just do 2 things: eat a low fat diet and exercise daily (aerobic and weight lifting). -GG : I want to see research to DEALY or stop menopause, but for some reason : no one is interested! They prefer to let women lose their hormones and : then supplement them pharmaceutically!! Hummm, wonder why? Could it be the horrible side effects and cancer risk??? -G
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Pat Kight wrote:
In article <355081A1.1…@worldbank.org, HAbadzi <HABA…@worldbank.org wrote: If you get the advice everyone in this group gave you to live without estrogen, you will age very visibly, like your ancestors. If you need to keep an appearance of youth and health, hormone supplementation is necessary. *sigh* I do wish we lived in a culture that placed less value on "the appearance of youth and health" and more on actual staying healthy as we age. A healthy old body has different needs than a healthy young body. And a "visibly aged" face can be just as beautiful as a smooth, young face. More beautiful, if you consider the smiles and tears and laughter it took to carve those wrinkles and lines. (Sometimes I feel like the next person who tells me, "But you don’t *look* your age" is going to get smacked upside the head. I*do* sometimes tell them, "Well, that’s because I’m *fat*, so the wrinkles don’t show yet." That shuts ‘em up …) –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Hi Pat: I think you have a wonderful attitude to both your age and your weight. Sonja had a wonderful post some months ago about older faces being more interesting. I may have been more photogenic at 21 but I wouldn’t go back to the person I was then, not that she was so bad, but I am who I am now, and I like that person better. (I must admit, though, that due to good genes I do not have a lot of wrinkles, also I have kept my face out of the sun all my adult life, which must have helped.) RuthJ
Response:
Wow! You think what Shelly wrote was a "flame’? Valerie I don’t think that you have ever been flamed if you do. Much hotter blazes have flared here than those two questions and the following suggestions and statements from Shelly. I also wondered why you suggested HRT to a woman who posted specifically that she didn’t want estrogen suggestions. Shelly’s suggestion to to look to side effects of any supplements being taken was very constructive and did not involve estrogen. I think that she best answered Bonnie’s request for suggestions to help chronic fatigue. There are also many sources of support for CFS which might also have some suggestions. Bonnie, please try a search for newsgroups or lists with CFS and you may find more helps. This is very frustrating and I hope you find help soon. Sincerely, fiona – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -kir…@sympatico.ca wrote in message <354F328F.3…@sympatico.ca
… Shelly, If you had BOTHERED to read my WHOLE post, instead of just picking out a few choice words that seemed to suit your purpose, you would have been RESPONSIBLE enough to see that I told her that maybe after her retesting this is something she and her doctor might consider. I don’t consider myself irresponsible, I was just letting her know what worked for a friend. Maybe being irresponsible should include flamming someone without reading what was originally written. I’ve done my reading and researching and don’t need someone like you giving me advice. Maybe you are the one breaching the "Ethics" of the newsgroup. Try reading posts thoroughly, first, before coming down on someone! Valerie shelly wrote: On Mon, 4 May 1998 kir…@sympatico.ca wrote: Hi Bonnie, This happened to a friend of mine. She was totally wiped out for most
of
the day, even after 8 or 9 hours of good sleep at night. A low dose of estrogen seemed to work for her. Now she’s fine. Maybe after your retesting this may be something your doctor would consider. Valerie Bonnie wrote: I’m in mid menopause and because of a suspecious mammogram am unable
to take
HRT until retesting in 4 months. I run out of steam around 11 each
morning.
Chronic fatigue the rest of the day. Any suggestions? Valerie, are you really suggesting that a woman with a suspicious mammogram take an estrogen drug as an "energy booster"? Any consideration of the impact on the uterus or the fatal flaws of the recent "low estrogen" study? You may want to do some basic reading about the risks of taking hormone drugs and their appropriate and limited uses. A good place to start is "Dr Susan Love’s Hormone Book: Making Informed Choices about Menopause." I personally consider Valerie’s drug advice to Bonnie as irresponsible, unfortunate and against what I see are the ethics of this newsgroup. Others may differ. Anyone who is suffering from "chronic fatigue" need to first consider if the are taking a Vitamin E supplement, of any doseage, and to stop immediately and wait a few weeks to see if they do not get better. Crashing fatigue, along with hair loss and stomach cramps are common Vit
E
overdose signs. shelly
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Bonnie wrote:
Gee guys, please don’t get in a fuss over me. I know you both were offering me advice that I asked for. I think meno can cause us all to get testy at times. Maybe I shouldn’t have used the word "suspecious" (which I spelled wrong). I had my first mammogram done a few weeks ago and because of my stupidity of not having had them done before, they have nothing to compare them to. They found 3 what-evers that they are calling "probably benign masses" after taking a closer look with a sonogram that I also had done after the mammogram picked them up. The specialist that talked with me advised that I should "probably avoid estrogen" until I was rechecked in 4 months. However, I’m now in full blown menopause and am having a horrible time of it. Hot flashes, brain fog, EXTREME fatigue. I own 2 businesses and have gotten to the point that I can’t keep these businesses running which I have to do. I spoke with ALL my doctors yesterday and they all have agreed to put me on the Fempatch since it is apparent that I cannot even function until the next sonogram is done. I have no breast cancer at all in my family. I will now go back a month earlier for another sonogram because of the Fempatch. I just wanted to give you the story and thank you BOTH for your concern for me.
Hi Bonnie: there was recently something in our local newspaper about a number of "false positives" in mammograms. I personally have had to have *every single* mammogram (that’s 6 so far, since age 40, I’m now 52) re-done because my weight has gone up and down so much and also I have my Mother’s fibrocystic breasts and am very hard to x-ray. The last mammogram I had done I had a very rude technician, and when I told her my left breast (the one with the wierd milk gland that gets sore before my period) was crooked in the machine she said "oh it’s ok" and took the film anyway. Back comes a film with a "suspicious mass". When I had the mammogram re-done by the head technician it came out fine. Hope that’s the case for you. (I can’t comment on the hormone issue because I don’t take them and know virtually nothing about them.) Hope you feel better soon. RuthJ
Response:
Hi Bonnie: there was recently something in our local newspaper about a number of "false positives" in mammograms. I personally have had to have *every single* mammogram (that’s 6 so far, since age 40, I’m now 52) re-done because my weight has gone up and down so much and also I have my Mother’s fibrocystic breasts and am very hard to x-ray.
Well its not false. I did the mammogram and they spotted the ‘what-evers’ then sent me to another part of the hospital where they did a very detailed and very long sonogram to get a better look. Then a specialist came in and spoke with me and had all the xrays – must have been at least 40 – and explain it all to me. She feels they are some type of benign cysts because there are 3 of them and she said usually cancerous tumors don’t come in 3’s. So for now they’ve given me the low dose Fempatch which I’ve had on for 24 hours and have felt no difference at all! I wonder how long it should take before I feel results. I don’t want to wear it if it isn’t going to help. This is just a temporary deal until I go back for another sonogram in mid July and see if the ‘what-evers’ have changed.
Response:
Bonnie <mi…@aol-nospam.com
wrote in article
<354F7CC3.58208…@qis.net
… blown menopause and am having a horrible time of it. Hot flashes, brain
fog,
EXTREME fatigue. I yesterday and they all have agreed to put me on the Fempatch since it is
Dear Bonnie, Estrogen in some form, in any form helps "Crashing Fatigue" right away, Within a week you will feel better and the hot flashes will stop. Brain fog takes awhile depending on your stress level.. You will feel better though never the same as before meno. This is what happened to me..you might discover new feelings for yourself. I’ve been doing this for 3 years… Good luck, Wendy Ardans
Response:
If you get the advice everyone in this group gave you to live without estrogen, you will age very visibly, like your ancestors. If you need to keep an appearance of youth and health, hormone supplementation is necessary. But apparently many benefits come from progesterone, not estrogen. Read "What your doctor may not tell you about menopause" by John R. Lee. Buy "natural" progesterone cream, (better pharmaceutically compounded throught a prescription at the International Women’s Pharmacy). It apparently keeps bones at least in good shape. And you may take tri-est with it, estriol-estrone-estrogen. It’s much safer than the premarin stuff on your breasts. I want to see research to DEALY or stop menopause, but for some reason no one is interested! They prefer to let women lose their hormones and then supplement them pharmaceutically!! The Strauser’s wrote:
I’m new to this group. Recently told that I’m post menopausal. Estrogen count is 23 according to blood tests. Doctor wants to fill me with estrogen. I’m reluctant so am exploring the options. Both parents died from cancer. I agree that menopause in itself is not an illness. (Tho I did appear to be crazy to some for the past 7 years.) Question is…without estrogen replacement….what am I supposed to be doing?
— The World Bank, 1818 H St. NW, Washington DC 20433, U.S.A. http://www.worldbank.org +1(202)477-1234
Response:
In article <355081A1.1…@worldbank.org
,
HAbadzi <HABA…@worldbank.org
wrote: If you get the advice everyone in this group gave you to live without estrogen, you will age very visibly, like your ancestors. If you need to keep an appearance of youth and health, hormone supplementation is necessary.
*sigh* I do wish we lived in a culture that placed less value on "the appearance of youth and health" and more on actual staying healthy as we age. A healthy old body has different needs than a healthy young body. And a "visibly aged" face can be just as beautiful as a smooth, young face. More beautiful, if you consider the smiles and tears and laughter it took to carve those wrinkles and lines. (Sometimes I feel like the next person who tells me, "But you don’t *look* your age" is going to get smacked upside the head. I*do* sometimes tell them, "Well, that’s because I’m *fat*, so the wrinkles don’t show yet." That shuts ‘em up …) –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
Gee guys, please don’t get in a fuss over me. I know you both were offering me advice that I asked for. I think meno can cause us all to get testy at times. Maybe I shouldn’t have used the word "suspecious" (which I spelled wrong). I had my first mammogram done a few weeks ago and because of my stupidity of not having had them done before, they have nothing to compare them to. They found 3 what-evers that they are calling "probably benign masses" after taking a closer look with a sonogram that I also had done after the mammogram picked them up. The specialist that talked with me advised that I should "probably avoid estrogen" until I was rechecked in 4 months. However, I’m now in full blown menopause and am having a horrible time of it. Hot flashes, brain fog, EXTREME fatigue. I own 2 businesses and have gotten to the point that I can’t keep these businesses running which I have to do. I spoke with ALL my doctors yesterday and they all have agreed to put me on the Fempatch since it is apparent that I cannot even function until the next sonogram is done. I have no breast cancer at all in my family. I will now go back a month earlier for another sonogram because of the Fempatch. I just wanted to give you the story and thank you BOTH for your concern for me.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Bonnie wrote:
Gee guys, please don’t get in a fuss over me. I know you both were offering me advice that I asked for. I think meno can cause us all to get testy at times. Maybe I shouldn’t have used the word "suspecious" (which I spelled wrong). I had my first mammogram done a few weeks ago and because of my stupidity of not having had them done before, they have nothing to compare them to. They found 3 what-evers that they are calling "probably benign masses" after taking a closer look with a sonogram that I also had done after the mammogram picked them up. The specialist that talked with me advised that I should "probably avoid estrogen" until I was rechecked in 4 months.
Bonnie, pardon me for butting here – it’s your body and your decision. But it’s possible to have a false negative mammogram and/or sonogram. Estrogen may help your symptoms but it may not. It will increase the density of your breast tissue and make future mammograms harder to read meaning that your next mammogram may be very different from this one and may again be labelled suspicious. Is there any reason why these "masses" aren’t being biopsied to put your mind at ease?
However, I’m now in full blown menopause and am having a horrible time of it. Hot flashes, brain fog, EXTREME fatigue. I own 2 businesses and have gotten to the point that I can’t keep these businesses running which I have to do. I spoke with ALL my doctors yesterday and they all have agreed to put me on the Fempatch since it is apparent that I cannot even function until the next sonogram is done.
I hope you are also going to be given some kind of progestin or progesterone to protect your uterus from the effects of the estrogen? marcie – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
I have no breast cancer at all in my family. I will now go back a month earlier for another sonogram because of the Fempatch. I just wanted to give you the story and thank you BOTH for your concern for me.
Response:
Shelly, If you had BOTHERED to read my WHOLE post, instead of just picking out a few choice words that seemed to suit your purpose, you would have been RESPONSIBLE enough to see that I told her that maybe after her retesting this is something she and her doctor might consider. I don’t consider myself irresponsible, I was just letting her know what worked for a friend. Maybe being irresponsible should include flamming someone without reading what was originally written. I’ve done my reading and researching and don’t need someone like you giving me advice. Maybe you are the one breaching the "Ethics" of the newsgroup. Try reading posts thoroughly, first, before coming down on someone! Valerie – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -shelly wrote:
On Mon, 4 May 1998 kir…@sympatico.ca wrote: Hi Bonnie, This happened to a friend of mine. She was totally wiped out for most of the day, even after 8 or 9 hours of good sleep at night. A low dose of estrogen seemed to work for her. Now she’s fine. Maybe after your retesting this may be something your doctor would consider. Valerie Bonnie wrote: I’m in mid menopause and because of a suspecious mammogram am unable to take HRT until retesting in 4 months. I run out of steam around 11 each morning. Chronic fatigue the rest of the day. Any suggestions? Valerie, are you really suggesting that a woman with a suspicious mammogram take an estrogen drug as an "energy booster"? Any consideration of the impact on the uterus or the fatal flaws of the recent "low estrogen" study? You may want to do some basic reading about the risks of taking hormone drugs and their appropriate and limited uses. A good place to start is "Dr Susan Love’s Hormone Book: Making Informed Choices about Menopause." I personally consider Valerie’s drug advice to Bonnie as irresponsible, unfortunate and against what I see are the ethics of this newsgroup. Others may differ. Anyone who is suffering from "chronic fatigue" need to first consider if the are taking a Vitamin E supplement, of any doseage, and to stop immediately and wait a few weeks to see if they do not get better. Crashing fatigue, along with hair loss and stomach cramps are common Vit E overdose signs. shelly
Response:
I have just recently started watching this newsgroup. I feel I went started menopause in my early 40’s. My doctor thought I was too young. The last 1-2 years has confirmed in my own mind that I have been in menopause. I agree with Shelly and Jackiej –in my own words – let nature run its course. It’s hard sometimes, but I really don’t believe drugs are the answer. I like Shelly’s comment — We didn’t try to drug away puberty or menstruation. I truly believe menopause is part of the human cycle. In today’s society, men (husbands in particular) are more aware about menopause and are much more supportive about it. There are times I would like to take something for it, but I know that it will run it’s course. I hope I can handle it and my family can help. There is more communication and awareness now between family and friends then when my Mother and women in her age bracket went through it. Good luck.
Response:
I’m new to this group. Recently told that I’m post menopausal. Estrogen count is 23 according to blood tests. Doctor wants to fill me with estrogen. I’m reluctant so am exploring the options. Both parents died from cancer. I agree that menopause in itself is not an illness. (Tho I did appear to be crazy to some for the past 7 years.) Question is…without estrogen replacement….what am I supposed to be doing?
Response:
The Strauser’s wrote:
I’m new to this group. Recently told that I’m post menopausal. Estrogen count is 23 according to blood tests. Doctor wants to fill me with estrogen. I’m reluctant so am exploring the options. Both parents died from cancer. I agree that menopause in itself is not an illness. (Tho I did appear to be crazy to some for the past 7 years.) Question is…without estrogen replacement….what am I supposed to be doing?
Eat a well-balanced diet containing about 45 gms of protein and get less than 30% of your calories from fat. Participate in moderate exercise, preferably both weight-bearing and aerobic. Keep your weight at a reasonable level and if you have diabetes or hypertension treat them appropriately. Don’t smoke. Keep your mind active through reading and learning. In a nutshell, all the same things you were doing before menopause, or if you weren’t doing them, now is a good time to start.
Response:
I’m in mid menopause and because of a suspecious mammogram am unable to take HRT until retesting in 4 months. I run out of steam around 11 each morning. Chronic fatigue the rest of the day. Any suggestions?
Response:
Hi Bonnie, This happened to a friend of mine. She was totally wiped out for most of the day, even after 8 or 9 hours of good sleep at night. A low dose of estrogen seemed to work for her. Now she’s fine. Maybe after your retesting this may be something your doctor would consider. Valerie – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Bonnie wrote:
I’m in mid menopause and because of a suspecious mammogram am unable to take HRT until retesting in 4 months. I run out of steam around 11 each morning. Chronic fatigue the rest of the day. Any suggestions?
Response:
You don’t say what your dosages are, but many women find Provera causes mood swings such as you describe; I am one of them, and even 2.5 mg a day was too much. I have quit all hrt now, and I am no longer depressed…Of course, this is just my own reaction– JackieJ h82w…@pacbell.net wrote:
Now I find out I’m in full – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
menopause, and the doc started me on hormones. Only been on for 5 days, but I am a mess. Crying big time, emotions all over the place. Anyone else experience this?
Response:
h82w…@pacbell.net wrote:
I have been in menopause for 2 years without knowing it – thought my dimished periods were from ovarian cysts. Now I find out I’m in full menopause, and the doc started me on hormones. Only been on for 5 days, but I am a mess. Crying big time, emotions all over the place. Anyone else experience this? I really have no friends going thru this, I’m in early menopause, and I need some support and questions answered. Can anyone help with some advice? Like, natural hormones, or synthetic? I know enough that I don’t want Premarin, but still, the stuff I’m taking can’t be much better. I’m on Ogen (estrogen) and Provera. Anybody know about these? What do most people take? Is there such a thing? This is really awful. If men went thru this, I think there would be a whole lot more information available. I am grateful for your help. – LL
I use to take Premarin and Proveara. I am now on Ogen only. I also take anti-hypertensives. Premarin is the most commonly estrogen replacement. Unfortnally it is manufactured from horse urine. Pre is for "pregant", marin is for Mare. Some people consider that "harveting" of the urine as "animinal abuse. You be the judge. Ogen is a plant derivative. Provera is synitized chemical analog of progestrone. CH3 groups have been added to the molecule backbone. What is the best? What you find works for you! When I started Premarin, I was have "mornining sickness" for 3 days and then it subsided. My emotions were "amplified" but I got use to them. In a few months I got back my sense of smell as well. Now days, don’t dare get between my and my hormones. Dani Richard
Response:
Suggesting estrogen drugs to a woman who has suspicious mammograms to use as an "energy booster" because it helped a friend, is irresponsible. shelly On Tue, 5 May 1998 kir…@sympatico.ca wrote:
Shelly, If you had BOTHERED to read my WHOLE post, instead of just picking out a few choice words that seemed to suit your purpose, you would have been RESPONSIBLE enough to see that I told her that maybe after her retesting this is something she and her doctor might consider.
shelly
Response:
On Mon, 27 Apr 1998 h82w…@pacbell.net wrote:
about these? What do most people take? Is there such a thing? This is really awful. If men went thru this, I think there would be a whole lot more information available. I am grateful for your help. – LL
Many of us are not taking anything at all and just riding the meno symptoms out. Menopause is an ancient passage and is self-limiting. It may take a while but this too will pass. And stress/angst can exacerbate it. Surgical menopause often needs medical intervention for the post surgical condition. And some non-surgical women find they simply can not live with some of the menopause signs and find medical intervention is appropriate for their individual situations. There is no one-size-fits-all. None. But luckily only one third of women have severe symptoms (including those who have had a surgical menopause which at one time was 65% of US women) . 2/3 of women apparently have only moderate or no meno symptoms. There is no well researched reason for any mild or asymptomatic woman to sign up for powerful and potentially dangerous artifical hormone drugs. We didn’t try to drug away puberty or menstruation. We lived quite nicely without estrogen and progesterone pre-puberty. Don’t get hooked into any unfounded medical meno myths about women universally "needing" drugs at this time in our lives. They are very controversial and badly tested. (And cheaply produced and heavily marketed, deceptively at that.) We will know more in the year 2008 when the very first objective testing of them will be completed. Everything else has been drivin by drug marketing forces so practically everything that are claimed about these drugs is commercially tainted. Read the origianal studies and you will see what I mean. Buyer beware. And be sure to watch out for all the miracle OTC drug testimonies you will get innundated with on the internet by multi-level-marketers selling primarily worthless "natural" progesterone placebo skin cremes and the mega supplement sellers. Again, buyer beware. Save your money for silk pajamas. You are in luck as in the past few years some excellent books, well researched and well-cited to the legitimate scientific literature, are available on the topic of meno and the drug industry’s attempt to court the baby-boomer demographics. See the website for some good suggestions: www.oxford.net/~tishy/ This is the premier Honor Code site for meno on the Health on the Net program which rates medical and health cites. It is excellent. Best advice if your doctor offers you drugs for this time in your life is to sit down and read line by line the FDA product insert for the suggested drug to see if this is really what you want to be putting in your body. I get labeled as "anti-drug" by many on this newsgroup. But I am really pro-informed consent. Know what you are putting into your very precious -and aging- body. Read widely and critically. Broaden your understanding of menopause well beyond the drug industry "deficiency" model, if your’s is a non-surgical menopause. And join the rest of us who are passing through this million year old adaptive passage without any drugs at all. But there is no reason not to look for comfort. Not at all. There is plenty of that to explore on this newsgroup and on the website. It can be rocky at times, but it can also be very revealing. Time to get into the best health habits you can for the rest of your life. And IMHO, these hormone drugs are not one of them. shelly
Response:
On Mon, 4 May 1998 kir…@sympatico.ca wrote:
Hi Bonnie, This happened to a friend of mine. She was totally wiped out for most of the day, even after 8 or 9 hours of good sleep at night. A low dose of estrogen seemed to work for her. Now she’s fine. Maybe after your retesting this may be something your doctor would consider. Valerie Bonnie wrote: I’m in mid menopause and because of a suspecious mammogram am unable to take HRT until retesting in 4 months. I run out of steam around 11 each morning. Chronic fatigue the rest of the day. Any suggestions?
Valerie, are you really suggesting that a woman with a suspicious mammogram take an estrogen drug as an "energy booster"? Any consideration of the impact on the uterus or the fatal flaws of the recent "low estrogen" study? You may want to do some basic reading about the risks of taking hormone drugs and their appropriate and limited uses. A good place to start is "Dr Susan Love’s Hormone Book: Making Informed Choices about Menopause." I personally consider Valerie’s drug advice to Bonnie as irresponsible, unfortunate and against what I see are the ethics of this newsgroup. Others may differ. Anyone who is suffering from "chronic fatigue" need to first consider if the are taking a Vitamin E supplement, of any doseage, and to stop immediately and wait a few weeks to see if they do not get better. Crashing fatigue, along with hair loss and stomach cramps are common Vit E overdose signs. shelly
Response:
I have been in menopause for 2 years without knowing it – thought my dimished periods were from ovarian cysts. Now I find out I’m in full menopause, and the doc started me on hormones. Only been on for 5 days, but I am a mess. Crying big time, emotions all over the place. Anyone else experience this? I really have no friends going thru this, I’m in early menopause, and I need some support and questions answered. Can anyone help with some advice? Like, natural hormones, or synthetic? I know enough that I don’t want Premarin, but still, the stuff I’m taking can’t be much better. I’m on Ogen (estrogen) and Provera. Anybody know about these? What do most people take? Is there such a thing? This is really awful. If men went thru this, I think there would be a whole lot more information available. I am grateful for your help. – LL
Response:
Chris Malcolm wrote:
Pat Kight <kig…@ucs.orst.edu writes: I’ve never bothered with makeup, moisturisers, etc., partly because the logic of trying to fix skin problems from the outside instead of the inside has always seemed silly to me, and partly because they make such a mess of my beard.
*splork* Um, yes, well, despite the unfortunate mental image, you do make a good point, Chris. I use moisturizers for the soothing factor – applied morning and night, they do reduce the itchiness. I’m also dubious about any "protective" factor; it seems to me that to really "protect" the skin from drying externally, one would have to apply something thick and gooey enough to really *seal* moisture into one’s skin. Which would be a Bad Idea even if you could do it; out skin is, in part, an organ of elimination and temperature control, and sealing it up would be unhealthy, to say the least. There’s absolutely no point buying expensive moisturizers, though, unless you have a lot of money to throw away and like the way they feel or smell. I just buy economy-sized bottles of whatever unscented store brand happens to be at hand. Tepid baths in Aveenobath or colloidal oatmeal can also be soothing. –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
I’m 52 and had a hystorectomy before 30, leaving my ovaries. I’m having mild to strong hot flashes, usually daily. I can handle it. I’ve tried estrogen and progestrin maybe ten years ago, and hated it. I felt like I was on my period thirty days a month. Other problems I’m having are very dry skin (always) and wimpy hair (for a couple years now). I’m thinking could be related also to a sluggish thyroid. My question is do I really need hormone replacement therapy? Thanks, Toni
Response:
Toni Loyd wrote in message
<5260-387D9120…@storefull-216.iap.bryant.webtv.net
…
I’m 52 and had a hystorectomy before 30, leaving my ovaries. I’m having mild to strong hot flashes, usually daily. I can handle it. I’ve tried estrogen and progestrin maybe ten years ago, and hated it. I felt like I was on my period thirty days a month. Other problems I’m having are very dry skin (always) and wimpy hair (for a couple years now). I’m thinking could be related also to a sluggish thyroid. My question is do I really need hormone replacement therapy? Thanks, Toni There is little science to justify the use of HRT. And there is growing evidence of its dangers. If you are into drug experimentation, you may want to discuss this with your doctor. Usually a re-evaluation of your lifestyle habits and an understanding of the aging process is what serves most "well-women" best at this time of life. I hope you will visit the volunteer website for this newsgroup for more information in order to make the very best individual choice for yourself. The URL for this website is: www.oxford.net/~tishy/beyond.html BTW: Are you taking Vit E supplements? They have been associated with hairloss, along with crashing fatigue, stomach cramps and other side effect problems. Best wishes, J
Response:
Toni Loyd wrote:
I’m 52 and had a hystorectomy before 30, leaving my ovaries. I’m having mild to strong hot flashes, usually daily. I can handle it. I’ve tried estrogen and progestrin maybe ten years ago, and hated it. I felt like I was on my period thirty days a month. Other problems I’m having are very dry skin (always) and wimpy hair (for a couple years now). I’m thinking could be related also to a sluggish thyroid. My question is do I really need hormone replacement therapy?
If, as you say, you can handle it – then I think you’ve answered your own question. Despite the drug company ads and the efforts of some doctors to put us *all* on hormones for the rest of our lives, there’s no evidence that we all "need" the stuff. I figure I’m not sick, just menopausal – so why take medicine? By all means get your thyroid tested, but it’s entirely possible the dry skin and "wimpy" hair, alas, are simply part of aging. Drinking loads of water and using a good, inexpensive moisturizer (especially the unscented kind) may help with the former; a good hairdresser ought to be able to help you figure out how to to the best with what you’ve got. My skin has dried to the point where I itch all winter long. The above tactics do help, as does limiting my time in very hot showers (*pout* … I *love* hot showers!). I’ve also stopped wearing makeup almost entirely, because I found that even the creamier "moisturizing" foundations were causing my facial skin to flake and dry. It took some getting used to (I used to be the kind of person who wouldn’t go on a camping trip without mascara!) but I think I actually look better without it — for one thing, the makeup doesn’t collect in all those little lines and creases any more! Hope this helps; welcome to the newsgroup. –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Barbara Russell wrote:
I am 49 years old and am perimenopausal. I began having some symptoms about 6 months ago, skipping periods occasionally and night sweats. Vitamin E took away the night sweats. I have never had a hot flash. In the past couple of months I have started getting periods almost nonstop. The periods last for approximately 10 days with only one week before they start up again. I tried the natural progesterone cream but it didn’t seem to help at all. About three weeks ago I started taking Prempro but I don’t think it’s helping at all. I know that it can take time for these drugs to work but I started taking it because of the frequent periods and because of extreme nervousness, sleepiness and anxiety. My period has just started up again after only one week since the last one and my nerves are shot. I called my Gyn and she suggested I take Xanax or Prozac. I was afraid of the Xanax because I’ve heard how addictive it is, so I opted for the Prozac. When I went to the Pharmacy to pick up the Prozac I was surprised to see that my prescription only had 25 pills and was non refillable. The literature I received with the Prozac said that it takes 4 weeks for this medication to become effective and the pharmacist also confirmed this. I am totally confused and disgusted at this point. I have a call into my Gyn but was told not to expect to hear from her until next Tuesday and today is Friday. I resisted taking HRT but finally had to give in order to keep my sanity. There has to be something better than this. Sorry to go on for so long but I guess I just needed to vent. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Barbara
Hi Barbara: Unfortunately, this sounds to me like a classic case of patient abuse. You have *menstrual* irregularities and are being given drugs which can affect your *mind*. This, in my opinion, is *wrong*. I have had depressions off and on for most of my adult life, and had a *terrible* reaction to Prozac. I believe it is an extremely dangerous drug and should be taken off the market. Just my opinion as a lay person, but my experience, lasting a total of two days, was that it sent my into a *RAGE*. Since then, I have accumulated a file of news clippings (not scientific studies) where incidents of violence were linked to Prozac. Very sadly, here in California, a young woman, who according to news reports was taking Prozac for depression, recently murdered her three daughters and tried to commit suicide. It appears the drug not only made her more depressed but it also made her violent. Since I had previously become more depressed taking Elavil, a much older drug, many years ago, I was smart enough to discontinue Prozac immediately. And give the "therapist" who illegally conned me into talking my then-doctor into prescribing it an hour long lecture on how evil she was. And file a complaint against her her. Unfortunately, the State of California did not act on my complaint, although I found out there were five others against her! The evil woman is still in business. I think you need to find a new doctor — preferably a woman of menopausal age who understands menstrual irregularities, as well as the mood swings and depressions that can accompany menopause. The nervousness, sleeplessness and anxiety you are experiencing are all symptoms which have been reported on this newsgroup, are probably natural menopausal occurrences, and the good news is that they will eventually pass. I have been having insomnia, which has been dragging me down, since November, and tried all kinds of herbs as well as prescription pills and all by itself the last few days it is gradually getting better. If your new doctor (and I hope you find a new doctor) still thinks you need help either sleeping or with anxiety, there are short-acting drugs you can take as needed (which is what I do: Ambien for sleep and Valium for anxiety). (I have no commercial connection to either of these drugs). While both of these drugs can be addictive if taken all the time, and you do build up a tolerance to them, if taken occasionally they both seem to work well for me. I also take Valium for migraines. Please forgive both the length and perhaps strong words of this post, but I am very concerned that you were prescribed Prozac, and I am also very concerned that your menstrual irregularities are not being addressed. You may be deficient in iron for bleeding that much, for example. The last year and a half or so my periods changed from five days to ten; a former co-worker, going through early menopause at about 39 or 40, had one month when she bled every day. One of the regular posters to this group has created a web site on menopause which may interest you: http://www.oxford.net/~tishy/asm.html Please post back and let us know how you are doing. RuthJ
Response:
Barbara Russell wrote in message <35253308.40661…@earthlink.net
… I am 49 years old and am perimenopausal. I began having some symptoms about 6 months ago, skipping periods occasionally and night sweats. Vitamin E took away the night sweats. I have never had a hot flash. In the past couple of months I have started getting periods almost nonstop. The periods last for approximately 10 days with only one week before they start up again. I tried the natural progesterone cream but it didn’t seem to help at all. About three weeks ago I started taking Prempro but I don’t think it’s helping at all. I know that it can take time for these drugs to work but I started taking it because of the frequent periods and because of extreme nervousness, sleepiness and anxiety. My period has just started up again after only one week since the last one and my nerves are shot.
Hi Barbara, Wow, it sounds like you are right at the peak when everything seems to be at its worst and you just can’t take another minute of anything or you’ll explode. Homemakerj has described this feeling and I think her theory is that this is when things have to start getting better. The nasty symptoms either start to go away or they shift gears and one set of them goes away to be replaced by another set. Sometimes Prempro or other HRT can help one through this time, but as you have found, it doesn’t always work. Your body is changing and there is nothing you can do about it, but get on through the passage. There is another side to the passage – an end to the tunnel you are in. We just can’t tell you how long it takes to get there. With Prempro, I think that the general advice is that it takes about 6 months for the periods to stop.
I called my Gyn and she suggested I take Xanax or Prozac. I was afraid of the Xanax because I’ve heard how addictive it is, so I opted for the Prozac. When I went to the Pharmacy to pick up the Prozac I was surprised to see that my prescription only had 25 pills and was non refillable. The literature I received with the Prozac said that it takes 4 weeks for this medication to become effective and the pharmacist also confirmed this. I am totally confused and disgusted at this point. I have a call into my Gyn but was told not to expect to hear from her until next Tuesday and today is Friday.
I don’t think that it’s unusual for a doctor to give a small prescription for the first time with this kind of drug. I don’t have experience with it, but isn’t it very expensive? It would be foolish for you to have a large supply of it and then maybe find that you can’t use it because of side effects or ineffectiveness. The doctor will want to hear from you about how this medication is affecting you, but there is no point in discussing it so early. Next week is soon enough for this kind of question. I’ll bet if you were having a bad reaction to a medication that a doctor would speak with you right away. IMO you need to calm yourself down and realize that you are doing the best you can to take care of yourself right now. You are going to be okay. Have you read any good general information books on menopause? Dr.Love’s Hormone Book is one that I keep nearby for a reference. You may be able to further help yourself by looking at your lifestyle habits and making any healthful changes needed – healthy diet, exercise, cut smoking, alcohol, sugar, salt, increase broccoli and cabbage, take your medicine, and try to feel better. You are not alone in this difficult passage. There are lots of others in front of you and soon you’ll be looking back at the newbies coming along where you have been. Hang in there kiddo! Things will get better. fiona – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
I resisted taking HRT but finally had to give in order to keep my sanity. There has to be something better than this. Sorry to go on for so long but I guess I just needed to vent. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Barbara
Response:
I am 49 years old and am perimenopausal. I began having some symptoms about 6 months ago, skipping periods occasionally and night sweats. Vitamin E took away the night sweats. I have never had a hot flash. In the past couple of months I have started getting periods almost nonstop. The periods last for approximately 10 days with only one week before they start up again. I tried the natural progesterone cream but it didn’t seem to help at all. About three weeks ago I started taking Prempro but I don’t think it’s helping at all. I know that it can take time for these drugs to work but I started taking it because of the frequent periods and because of extreme nervousness, sleepiness and anxiety. My period has just started up again after only one week since the last one and my nerves are shot. I called my Gyn and she suggested I take Xanax or Prozac. I was afraid of the Xanax because I’ve heard how addictive it is, so I opted for the Prozac. When I went to the Pharmacy to pick up the Prozac I was surprised to see that my prescription only had 25 pills and was non refillable. The literature I received with the Prozac said that it takes 4 weeks for this medication to become effective and the pharmacist also confirmed this. I am totally confused and disgusted at this point. I have a call into my Gyn but was told not to expect to hear from her until next Tuesday and today is Friday. I resisted taking HRT but finally had to give in order to keep my sanity. There has to be something better than this. Sorry to go on for so long but I guess I just needed to vent. Any feedback will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Barbara
Response:
I live in the miidwest near a large teaching hospital. I just had a bone scan at a clinic funded by this hospital. My spine reading was a -3.2 (depressing).The doctor who went over the reading with me said I most certainly should talk to my doctor about starting some form of HRT.Even after I told her I had a bad reaction to Prempro & my Aunt just died from breast cancer.I said "so you still think women shold take ERT ?" "yes, I do" she said. I said "I don’t think my doctor is gung ho on this anymore." She said "Oh, you mean because of the recent findings ?""Well, that’s just one study". We are working to prove that women such as you should take estrogen to keep your bones.". I wish I would have had the back bone to tell her I thought she was full of it. They can rope women in with free bone tests all they want,but I’m not going to be part of their study !! She said just because I had a bad experience with Prempro is no reason not to try another form,like maybe a low dose without progesterone.Yeah, sure I will. Umhuh .Lora
Response:
Lora wrote:
I live in the miidwest near a large teaching hospital. I just had a bone scan at a clinic funded by this hospital. My spine reading was a -3.2 (depressing).The doctor who went over the reading with me said I most certainly should talk to my doctor about starting some form of HRT.Even after I told her I had a bad reaction to Prempro & my Aunt just died from breast cancer.I said "so you still think women shold take ERT ?" "yes, I do" she said. I said "I don’t think my doctor is gung ho on this anymore." She said "Oh, you mean because of the recent findings ?""Well, that’s just one study". We are working to prove that women such as you should take estrogen to keep your bones.".
Eeeeew. If that’s really the way she phrased it, it sounds to me like someone who’s made up their mind and doesn’t want to consider the evidence.
I wish I would have had the back bone to tell her I thought she was full of it.
Well, no matter what you told her, you have every right to control your own health care. If you’re concerned about your bones, there are *lots* of things you can do, from incresing weight-bearing exercise and training for good balance to investigating other drugs which may be less problematic for you.
They can rope women in with free bone tests all they want,but I’m not going to be part of their study !! She said just because I had a bad experience with Prempro is no reason not to try another form,like maybe a low dose without progesterone.Yeah, sure I will. Umhuh .Lora
Did she discuss any other options with you? –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
Hi, just found this group and have enjoyed reading some of the posts. It seems as though most are agains HRT for perimenopause symptoms. I am in that boat and a female Dr. has given me some Phemphase to try for a few months to see if it helps. Any information would be appreciated. Thanks Brenda
Response:
It seems as though most are agains HRT for perimenopause symptoms. I am in that boat and a female Dr. has given me some Phemphase to try for a few months to see if it helps.
I started taking Premphase while still in perimenopause and bled like hell for three months. Your mileage may vary. I hear you can crush up the pills and use them to fertilize your houseplants, though… Regards, Laura lblanch…@aol.com
Response:
Hi Brenda. I’m in the UK but if Premphase is the same as PremPak – I loved it at first and loathed it later. Even in the early stages (when I thought it was A Good Thing) I was getting a few mild side effects (such as water retention, slight weight gain) and by the second month I had red and puffy hands and feet (no idea why). By the end of the second month the progesterone part of the cycle was unpleasant enough (heavier bleeding) to make me change prescription (which was no better). I don’t take HRT now. I don’t want to. I found I can manage without it. Good luck with your experiment but I would encourage you to stick around asm. Not only because you will find a lot of information that you might be very glad to have, but also ‘cos it can be quite fun round here at times
silver bfsmo <bf…@i1.net
wrote in message
news:01beb8e3$a427a0a0$d98e4ad1@default…
Hi, just found this group and have enjoyed reading some of the posts. It
seems as though most are agains HRT for perimenopause symptoms. I am in that boat and a female Dr. has given me some Phemphase to try for a few months to see if it helps. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Any information would be appreciated. Thanks Brenda
Response:
Thanks Joanna. I guess I’m just a little scared of the whole thing. I have all the symptoms and feel all out of sorts and crummy. I am just hoping that the HRT will make me feel better and scared that it won’t. I will start on the Phemphase on Sunday so wish me luck. Brenda Joanna Prescott <joa…@lotos-land.demon.co.uk
wrote in article
<3792762e.48319…@news.demon.co.uk
…
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 17:10:04 GMT, "bfsmo" <bf…@i1.net wrote: Hello Brenda and welcome to asm. You’ll find very few women here who would be against the use of HRT _generally_ in order to deal with short-term unbearable problems unless, of course, it is contra-indicated by a history of breast cancer.
Response:
Joanna Prescott <joa…@lotos-land.demon.co.uk
wrote in message
news:37774829.8085234@news.demon.co.uk…
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999 02:09:50 +0100, "silver" <sil…@starlight.freeserve.co.uk wrote: I’m in the UK but if Premphase is the same as PremPak – I loved it at
first and loathed it later. Even in the early stages (when I thought it was A Good Thing) I was getting a few mild side effects (such as water retention, slight weight gain) and by the second month I had red and puffy hands and feet (no idea why).
This was precisely my experience on PremPak. By the end of the second month the progesterone part of the cycle was
unpleasant enough (heavier bleeding) to make me change prescription (which was no better).
Well for me, it did control my bleeding but the progesterone made me
anxious, more foggy, and [almost] suicidally depressed. What were you offered as an alternative out of interest? I asked for prometrium or the European equivalent but was reluctantly given a script for Climen [My doc is not pro-HRT]. I didn’t fill it.
I don’t take HRT now. I don’t want to. I found I can manage without
it.
I find I can manage better without it! [Fingers crossed] Joanna
My dosage on PremPak was 0.625mg. This was later changed to Femoston 1/10 with an extra dollop of Norethisterone thrown in. When the side effects increased I was prescribed a patch instead, Estracombi. I never used the patch as I became ill before the beginning of the next cycle. I hope I never have to go near the stuff again
silver
Response:
In reviewing past posting, I didn’t find anything on pros and cons of HRT if breast cancer runs in your family. I know about Hrt resulting in less bone loss, better skin elasticity, etc. But will I be sorry with my decision in 20 years? Opinions, articles, anyone?
Oh, wow, have we got opinions on this one! Not me at the moment, because I don’t have symptoms that full HRT will do anything about and I’m not convinced of the long-term benefits for me, given my family’s long-lived, strong-boned, heart-healthy track record. So I haven’t been following the debate too carefully. But I *think* the consensus is that if you’re at risk for breast cancer you should think long and hard about HRT because even with the protective effects of progestins added in there’s a chance that the estrogen will stimulate an existing cancer. Jump in, folks, if I’ve misspoken. Regards, Laura Blanchard lblanch…@aol.com posted to alt.support.menopause and e-mailed to author
Response:
In reviewing past posting, I didn’t find anything on pros and cons of HRT if breast cancer runs in your family. I know about Hrt resulting in less bone loss, better skin elasticity, etc. But will I be sorry with my decision in 20 years? Opinions, articles, anyone? ——————-==== Posted via Deja News ====———————– http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
Response:
:
In reviewing past posting, I didn’t find anything on pros and cons of HRT
:
if breast cancer runs in your family. I know about Hrt resulting in less
:
bone loss, better skin elasticity, etc. But will I be sorry with my
:
decision in 20 years? Opinions, articles, anyone?
Hi, First of all it is important to sort out which claim is being made for which drug. The estrogen (ERT) product label itself says there is no skin benefit and there are no approved uses for progesterone so this skin thing is in the land of wishful thinking and a drug marketer’s dream. Estrogen was heavily sold to the general public in the 1960’s as a secret beauty potion in a book called "Feminine Forever" which was published by drug company money. Much of that marketing myth is still with us today which is why the estrogen product insert has to warn women this is not true and that long term use of this product is dangerous. Selling eternal youth and beauty has always been so universally appealing and estrogen in the 1960′ was the the elixer du jour. Some of the older books still imply this is the case. Is someone scaring you into thinking you will be sorry if you don’t take these drugs? This can easily be the implication one gets from their doctor. We even had one here who said he had no real financial interest in gettin meno women on drugs because he would make more money on them trying to fix them if they did not take drugs …implying they would have heart attacks and osteo problems etc. No adequate proof exists that estrogen and/or progesterone (HRT) have any long term benefits. However, this does not stop this -implication- from being repeated over and over again until it sounds like it is in fact the truth. This is why the very first long term trials are now underway and beginning answers will not even be available until 2005. It sounds like some one tried to scare you with some non-existing facts on this issue. I am sorry especially if this was an authority figure in your life. There are some very sound, no nonsense books out there to read. Acid test for me as to a books credibility is they make heart benefit claims, then the book is badly out of date. And it they get too carried away with bone benefits, then it is overstating the known facts. And if the book is really in fact selling youth and beauty via castration and estrogen, then it is in the land of pseudo-science. Check any book to see how well it is cited to independent studies and peer reviewed medical journal cites. And then see if you can look up some of those studies yourself so you can best judge the credibility of the material. Still the best advice is to read the FDA product insert itself to get started on what you want to know about a drug you are being asked to take …for life. Joan L.
Response:
I am new to this so please bear with me if I do something "wrong"! I would like some input regarding HRT. I originally opted for this treatment when I could no longer handle waking up during the night for longer periods than I was sleeping. Plus I was having hot flashes. After trying all the natural remedies to no avail, I chose to go on estrogen. After having break through bleeding I had all the prescribed tests and the dosage of progesterine I was taking was upped from 2.5 for 15 days a month to 10 for 10 days per month. I was wondering if anyone out there has had any experience with this. I am not one to want to take medication of any kind but felt this was a necessary step to take to get my life back to normal. However, I am uncomfortable with this latest development. Does this increase in dosage mean "always" or will it be cut back when the bleeding is under control? Do you ever stop bleeding when you take HRT? Thanks in advance for any answers/advice you can offer. <(:<)=
Response:
Lianne, Thanks for tracking the newbie posts to see who needs answering. Kardiolady hasn’t said what HRT she is taking and whether or not it helped with the sleeplessness and hot flashes. It is not unusual to up the progestin to stop breakthrough bleeding (Laura where are you?). I don’t know how big a dose is usually used. It doesn’t seem reasonable to expect that the large dose would be needed forever. It’s been reported that many women stop bleeding after 6 months of Prempro treatment or with continuous estrogen/progesterone rather than cyclic. Women on cyclic HRT continue to have periods until they stop the HRT. By all of the rpescribed tests, do you mean endometrial biopsy to check for a cause of the bleeding? Cheryl – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Lianne McNeil wrote in message <34510E6B.4…@seesig.pobox.com
… Does anyone who has used HRT have any answers for this lady? I haven’t seen any responses, and I can’t answer the question… Lianne KARDIOLADY wrote: I am new to this so please bear with me if I do something "wrong"! I
would
like some input regarding HRT. I originally opted for this treatment
when I
could no longer handle waking up during the night for longer periods
than I
was sleeping. Plus I was having hot flashes. After trying all the
natural
remedies to no avail, I chose to go on estrogen. After having break
through
bleeding I had all the prescribed tests and the dosage of progesterine I
was
taking was upped from 2.5 for 15 days a month to 10 for 10 days per
month. I
was wondering if anyone out there has had any experience with this. I
am not
one to want to take medication of any kind but felt this was a necessary
step
to take to get my life back to normal. However, I am uncomfortable with
this
latest development. Does this increase in dosage mean "always" or will
it be
cut back when the bleeding is under control? Do you ever stop bleeding
when
you take HRT? Thanks in advance for any answers/advice you can offer.
<(:<)=
— No spam. No announcements. No commercial e-mail. Remove "seesig." from this for e-mail. Do not add my name/address to any mail lists.
Response:
I can assure you that this is not true. I was prescribed Provera over 12 years ago.
Response:
I have heard that progestin has been used for menopausal women for only about eight years. Is this true? If it is true, how does anyone know the longterm effects?
Response:
Thank you, I will pass this along to my friend. Cathy — P.H.O.B.I.A. People Helping Others Become Independent Again Off-line Self Help Support Group, NJ http://community.nj.com/cc/phobia Anxiety Treatment Options http://www.members.tripod.com/~PhobiaGroup/index.html "Pat Kight" <kig…@ucs.orst.edu
wrote in message
news:8atu51$jvh$1@news.NERO.NET… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
In article <8atanf0…@news1.newsguy.com, P.H.O.B.I.A. <cat…@dov.adelphia.net wrote: Hi Pat & Kali, After natural menopause do the ovaries still make a small amount of
Estrogen
for the remainder of our lives? Several parts of our bodies do, including our adrenal glands and fatty tissues (it looks like there may be an actual biological benefit in a certain amount of middle-aged spread!) If Osteoporosis is a problem associated with Menopause would calcium supplements help? These are the question that I believe my friend is wondering about, she does not want to keep taking the HRT but her doctor
is
very unyielding. Osteoporosis is a problem associated with aging – for *some* people, both men and women. Yes, there are studies which indicate that the estrogen our own bodies produce has a beneficial effect on our bones, and that bone loss begins to occur at around the same age as menopause. But it happens to men, too, so obviously the situation is more complex than just less estrogen=thinner bones. But there are a couple of things to keep in mind: Despite what the ads and drug companies tell us, osteoporosis is *not* an inevitable part of growing older. It’s a specific, diagnosable, pathological condition, and not everyone gets it. And it’s evidently not as simple as "take estrogen, save your bones." There are a lot of studies on this, and you can find references to several of them at http://menopause.tripod.com/#osteo As for other strategies for keeping our bones strong as we age: Taking calcium pills isn’t the only, or even the best one. It’s probably better to get calcium from your diet than from pills, and that’s not terribly difficult in the U.S., where we have access to a lot of calcium-rich foods. And weight-bearing exercise — excercise that puts a load on your bones, such as light weight training, resistance work and even walking — is one of the best things we can do to keep our bones strong. Since you said your friend is surgically menopausal, I urge you to check out the Surgi-Pause site, http://members.tripod.com/fiona_51/, for lots of information that may help her make her decision. And remember: She owns her body; her doctor doesn’t. This is her decision, not his. If he doesn’t like it, perhaps she may wish to find another doctor. Regards, –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
Pat Kight <kig…@ucs.orst.edu
wrote in message
news:8aq0d9$e4u$1@news.NERO.NET…
The bottom line: Despite what some doctors persist in telling us, there is little evidence for that even surgically menopausal women need to take these drugs for life, and growing evidence that doing so may be a very bad idea.
Yikes, Pat. Are you remembering that, compared with intact women (no drugs), surgically menopausal women (no drugs), while lowering their risk for breast cancer, are at increased risk of heart disease and real osteoporosis? ERT may not help so much the intact woman, but I do, personally believe that the studies show benefit for the surgically menopausal and that is one reason why I continue it. 2005 will be when I know for sure what I want to do. For now I can’t afford to stop it and deal with any withdrawal problems. Kalli ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://members.tripod.com/fiona_51 Surgical Menopause ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Response:
In article <9QfA4.4331$iP.297…@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
,
Kalli <canel…@netzero.net
wrote: Pat Kight <kig…@ucs.orst.edu wrote in message news:8aq0d9$e4u$1@news.NERO.NET… The bottom line: Despite what some doctors persist in telling us, there is little evidence for that even surgically menopausal women need to take these drugs for life, and growing evidence that doing so may be a very bad idea. Yikes, Pat. Are you remembering that, compared with intact women (no drugs), surgically menopausal women (no drugs), while lowering their risk for breast cancer, are at increased risk of heart disease and real osteoporosis? ERT may not help so much the intact woman, but I do, personally believe that the studies show benefit for the surgically menopausal and that is one reason why I continue it.
Yes, I understand that, but as I read the more recent studies, it does appear to me that the evidence for benefit – even *for* surgically menopausal women – is shrinking. You’re smart and well-read and have made the decision you believe is best for you; I have a lot of respect for that. But I do think it’s possible that another smart, well-informed woman in much the same situation might make an different decision, based on the same evidence. That’s pretty much all I was trying to tell P.H.O.B.I.A. – that her friend needs to look at the best, most recent information available and decide for herself whether she wishes to continue on hormones. And that if she decides not to, she can expect the "withdrawal problems" you mention.
2005 will be when I know for sure what I want to do. For now I can’t afford to stop it and deal with any withdrawal problems.
–Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
Hi Pat & Kali, After natural menopause do the ovaries still make a small amount of Estrogen for the remainder of our lives? If Osteoporosis is a problem associated with Menopause would calcium supplements help? These are the question that I believe my friend is wondering about, she does not want to keep taking the HRT but her doctor is very unyielding. Cathy — P.H.O.B.I.A. People Helping Others Become Independent Again Off-line Self Help Support Group, NJ http://community.nj.com/cc/phobia Anxiety Treatment Options http://www.members.tripod.com/~PhobiaGroup/index.html "Pat Kight" <kig…@ucs.orst.edu
wrote in message
news:8as40a$4fm$1@news.NERO.NET… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In article <9QfA4.4331$iP.297…@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, > Kalli <canel…@netzero.net> wrote: > >Pat Kight <kig…@ucs.orst.edu
wrote in message
> >news:8aq0d9$e4u$1@news.NERO.NET… > >> The bottom line: Despite what some doctors persist in telling us, there is
little evidence for that even surgically menopausal women need to take these drugs for life, and growing evidence that doing so may be a very
bad
idea. Yikes, Pat. Are you remembering that, compared with intact women (no drugs), surgically menopausal women (no drugs), while lowering their
risk
for breast cancer, are at increased risk of heart disease and real osteoporosis? ERT may not help so much the intact woman, but I do, personally believe that the studies show benefit for the surgically menopausal and that is one reason why I continue it. Yes, I understand that, but as I read the more recent studies, it does appear to me that the evidence for benefit – even *for* surgically menopausal women – is shrinking. You’re smart and well-read and have made the decision you believe is best for you; I have a lot of respect for that. But I do think it’s possible that another smart, well-informed woman in much the same situation might make an different decision, based on the same evidence. That’s pretty much all I was trying to tell P.H.O.B.I.A. – that her friend needs to look at the best, most recent information available and decide for herself whether she wishes to continue on hormones. And that if she decides not to, she can expect the "withdrawal problems" you mention. 2005 will be when I know for sure what I want to do. For now I can’t afford to stop it and
deal
with any withdrawal problems. –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
On Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:08:39 -0500, "P.H.O.B.I.A." <cat…@adelphia.net
wrote: Hi Pat & Kali, After natural menopause do the ovaries still make a small amount of Estrogen for the remainder of our lives? If Osteoporosis is a problem associated with Menopause would calcium supplements help? These are the question that I believe my friend is wondering about, she does not want to keep taking the HRT but her doctor is very unyielding. Cathy
Cathy, Your friend needs to make her own decision and find a doctor who will work *with* her, not one who thinks he/she has the right to dictate to his/her patients. If she wants to stop taking hormones, it’s his/her job to help her find a way to do that and still resolve any health concerns she might have. If she actually *has* osteoporosis then there are drugs intended to treat this disease that would be more beneficial – fosamax, didronel, calcitonin, for example. If this is supposed to be "preventative" then she needs to weigh what she sees as the risks and benefits. Even women without ovaries produce an estrogen precursor in their body fat which the adrenals convert to estrone. The body can convert this estrone to any one of the other two prominent estrogens in a woman’s body, estradiol or estriol, so amount of body fat might play a part in her decision. Diet and weight-bearing exercise play a much larger role in this disease than exogenous hormones. She should also make sure she spends 15 minutes in full sunlight (face, arms, and hands)without sunscreens/sunblocks every day to make sure she has sufficient Vitamin D. *NOTE* 15 minutes only, not bake in the sun. Hope this helps Terri
Response:
In article <8atanf0…@news1.newsguy.com
,
P.H.O.B.I.A. <cat…@dov.adelphia.net
wrote: Hi Pat & Kali, After natural menopause do the ovaries still make a small amount of Estrogen for the remainder of our lives?
Several parts of our bodies do, including our adrenal glands and fatty tissues (it looks like there may be an actual biological benefit in a certain amount of middle-aged spread!)
If Osteoporosis is a problem associated with Menopause would calcium supplements help? These are the question that I believe my friend is wondering about, she does not want to keep taking the HRT but her doctor is very unyielding.
Osteoporosis is a problem associated with aging – for *some* people, both men and women. Yes, there are studies which indicate that the estrogen our own bodies produce has a beneficial effect on our bones, and that bone loss begins to occur at around the same age as menopause. But it happens to men, too, so obviously the situation is more complex than just less estrogen=thinner bones. But there are a couple of things to keep in mind: Despite what the ads and drug companies tell us, osteoporosis is *not* an inevitable part of growing older. It’s a specific, diagnosable, pathological condition, and not everyone gets it. And it’s evidently not as simple as "take estrogen, save your bones." There are a lot of studies on this, and you can find references to several of them at http://menopause.tripod.com/#osteo As for other strategies for keeping our bones strong as we age: Taking calcium pills isn’t the only, or even the best one. It’s probably better to get calcium from your diet than from pills, and that’s not terribly difficult in the U.S., where we have access to a lot of calcium-rich foods. And weight-bearing exercise — excercise that puts a load on your bones, such as light weight training, resistance work and even walking — is one of the best things we can do to keep our bones strong. Since you said your friend is surgically menopausal, I urge you to check out the Surgi-Pause site, http://members.tripod.com/fiona_51/, for lots of information that may help her make her decision. And remember: She owns her body; her doctor doesn’t. This is her decision, not his. If he doesn’t like it, perhaps she may wish to find another doctor. Regards, –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
Hello ASM, I am posting this question for a friend: My friend has had a complete Hysterectomy many years ago (probably when she was 30 to 40ish) she is in her 60’s now and is on HRT. Her hysterectomy was complete with removal of ovaries, uterus & cervix due to ovarian cysts and excessive bleeding. I am sure no intelligent doctor would resort to this today. But anyway……… she would like to know if she really needs to have HRT. Especially since the new reports on women not benefiting from HRT in regard to heart disease. Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thank you Cathy — P.H.O.B.I.A. People Helping Others Become Independent Again Off-line Self Help Support Group, NJ http://community.nj.com/cc/phobia Anxiety Treatment Options http://www.members.tripod.com/~PhobiaGroup/index.html
Response:
She never needed it for heart disease, and that has been stated right there on the FDA drug warning label for estrogen drugs for years. Premarin was not able to present any proof that their drug product helped in any fashion for either treatment or prevention of osteoporosis. They presented 7 studies and the FDA rejected all 7. No proof. Only by appealing to another reveiw board was a compromise consensus agreement reached, that got translated as an authorized use of this drug for surrogate bone "benefits." But keep in mind this is NOT proof of any value, only an opinion that they hope it helps, but are clueless if in fact it does. Since the bone "benefits" require lifetime use, and what appears to be ever-increasing doses of these drug to get this surrogate "benefit", all of the other strong warnings exist about long-term use of these drugs. Long term use of HRT increases the risks of getting the following aging diseases: cancers, strokes, heart disease, gall bladder disease, blood clots, diabetes, arthritis and asthma. Why do you suppose, knowing all of this like a good doctor should who keeps up on the research in the leading scientific journals, this doctor talked this asymptomatic woman into taking these drugs? Do yoy think the doctor listened to his commercial drug sales rep instead of the scientific literature? I think so. The only good news here is that in 2005 we will know a little bit more about these drugs as there is finally the only indpendent, placebo controlled prospective study ever done on them. These results will not be in for another 5 years. If I were your friend, and I am not and I do not share her health history, I would wait until there was proof that any benefits outweighed the significant side effects now getting associated with the use of these drugs. Your friend’s sense and need for risk taking may be quite different than mine. J P.H.O.B.I.A. <cat…@adelphia.net
wrote in message
news:8apnhm0na9@news2.newsguy.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Hello ASM, I am posting this question for a friend: My friend has had a complete Hysterectomy many years ago (probably when
she
was 30 to 40ish) she is in her 60’s now and is on HRT. Her hysterectomy
was
complete with removal of ovaries, uterus & cervix due to ovarian cysts and excessive bleeding. I am sure no intelligent doctor would resort to this today. But anyway……… she would like to know if she really needs to have HRT. Especially since the new reports on women not benefiting from
HRT
in regard to heart disease. Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thank you Cathy — P.H.O.B.I.A. People Helping Others Become Independent Again Off-line Self Help Support Group, NJ http://community.nj.com/cc/phobia Anxiety Treatment Options http://www.members.tripod.com/~PhobiaGroup/index.html
Response:
In article <aF_z4.1775$hC3.285…@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net
,
Joan Livingston <joan.livingst…@gte.net
wrote: Why do you suppose, knowing all of this like a good doctor should who keeps up on the research in the leading scientific journals, this doctor talked this asymptomatic woman into taking these drugs?
However, P.H.O.B.I.A. didn’t say anything about her friend’s symptoms or lack of them. What she said was:
My friend has had a complete Hysterectomy many years ago (probably when she was 30 to 40ish) she is in her 60’s now and is on HRT. Her hysterectomy was complete with removal of ovaries, uterus & cervix due to ovarian cysts and excessive bleeding.
At the age she was when she had surgery, P.H.O.B.I.A., it makes some sense that your friend’s doctor would have prescribed hormones to help her through the abrupt transition into surgical menopause. Considering recent studies about the potential risks of long-term hormone use, and considering that your friend is now at an age when she likely would be menopausal even without the surgery, she may well wish to stop taking these drugs. I would suggest that she consult with her doctor about whether it is advisable to stop them abruptly or wean herself from them gradually. She should be aware that she may well experience some of the discomforts of menopause when she stops taking the drugs, and it may take her some time to get them out of her system. The bottom line: Despite what some doctors persist in telling us, there is little evidence for that even surgically menopausal women need to take these drugs for life, and growing evidence that doing so may be a very bad idea. Regards, –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
Hi Lois, Welcome to a.s.m. My first thought is why did you see the doctor? Regular checkup? Did you have symptoms that were bothering you? It doesn’t sound like it from your post. If you are doing okay, what rationale did your doctor have for you to start taking drugs? Was it just because you reached a certain age or something? Cool Runnings, HomemakerJ – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Lois wrote:
This is the first time in your group. A month ago my doctor suggested I consider going on HRT. I have been doing very well without for 8 years now, and am worried about this change — and certainly don’t want to go back to having periods. I have been reading everything I can get my hands on — and still can’t make up my mind to go ahead. Any thoughts?? and thanks.
Response:
This is the first time in your group. A month ago my doctor suggested I consider going on HRT. I have been doing very well without for 8 years now, and am worried about this change — and certainly don’t want to go back to having periods. I have been reading everything I can get my hands on — and still can’t make up my mind to go ahead. Any thoughts?? and thanks.
Response:
Lois wrote: This is the first time in your group. A month ago my doctor suggested I consider going on HRT. I have been doing very well without for 8
years now, and
am worried about this change — and certainly don’t want to go back to
having
periods. I have been reading everything I can get my hands on — and still can’t make up my mind to go ahead. Any thoughts?? and thanks.
There is lots of information on the pros and cons of HRT all over the net. Try the New York Times which has a women’s health page with archives to articles written in the Times over the past couple of years. The American Medical Association at www.ama-assn.org has a women’s health section and also access to all their research articles. Lots’ of other sources. The reasons doctors suggest HRT is because it is associated with health and longevity — specifically reduced rates of heart disease, osteoporosis — and perhaps Alzheimer’s Disease and Colon cancer. All this is based on preliminary research — although there is quite a bit of consistency in findings. There is also similar research that suggests that HRT over the long term increases the risk of breast cancer. many HRT regimines do not involve periods being re-established. e.g. Prempro is taken continuously and involves no reintroduction of bleeding.
Response:
Hope I’m doing this right since its my first time using a newsgroup. I"m 44 and have had intermittent period for past year. Suffered with vertigo followed by anxiety,depression and hot flashes. My gynocologist prescribed premphase (fsh level was 96). This has all come to as a shock to me since I figured menopause started in the 50’s for most women. I’m reading Ann Louise Gittleman’s book "Before the Change" and this among other reading has freaked me about synthetic HRT. I have the prescription sitting here next to me and I don’t want to take it. I’ve recently started taking vitamins and they seem to be helping. But I"m still wondering if I should take premphase or not…I would appreciate any feedback….
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Hamilton wrote:
Lois wrote: This is the first time in your group. A month ago my doctor suggested I consider going on HRT. I have been doing very well without for 8 years now, and am worried about this change — and certainly don’t want to go back to having periods. I have been reading everything I can get my hands on — and still can’t make up my mind to go ahead. Any thoughts?? and thanks. There is lots of information on the pros and cons of HRT all over the net. Try the New York Times which has a women’s health page with archives to articles written in the Times over the past couple of years. The American Medical Association at www.ama-assn.org has a women’s health section and also access to all their research articles. Lots’ of other sources.
Try the unofficial asm web page for starters. It has links to many non-commercial good sites for information.http://www.oxford.net/~tishy
The reasons doctors suggest HRT is because it is associated with health and longevity — specifically reduced rates of heart disease, osteoporosis — and perhaps Alzheimer’s Disease and Colon cancer. All this is based on preliminary research — although there is quite a bit of consistency in findings. There is also similar research that suggests that HRT over the long term increases the risk of breast cancer.
An interesting answer but one which is basically meaningless. Two questions immediately arise. Doctors may suggest hormones for these reasons but that does not, ipso facto, mean that such a suggestion is appropriate or that these are issues with which the menopausal and most-menopausal woman should be especially concerned. Breast cancer risk has been documented in epidemiological studies and just recently in the lab – premarin causes changes in DNA which are precursors to cancers. This danger in hormone use is real. The benefits in the cases of heart disease are ephemeral and the last study (done by Kaiser-Permanente) showed no benefit at all. Also if the Nurses’ Study is corrected for the skewed population and for exclusion of those at highest risk, the difference between the homone and non-hormones groups in terms of heart disease is statistically insignificant. The Alzheimer’s connection, like the colon cancer one, is very tentative and has numerous statistical problems. There are no good studies showing this "benefit" although one notices that it being hyped in the news a great deal lately perhaps because Alzheimer’s is a sufficiently horrible disease that women might be willing to risk breast cancer to avoid it. But as with heart disease the risk of breast cancer is real and documented but the benefit in avoiding Alzheimer’s may not be. Women are being needlessly frightened by doctors and drug company ads about osteoporosis. Bone thinning is normal and is not necessarily pathological in the post-menopausal woman. The bone density "benefits" of hormones last only so long as the drug is continued.
many HRT regimines do not involve periods being re-established. e.g. Prempro is taken continuously and involves no reintroduction of bleeding.
Except that some bleeding does occur – to be honest this is *not* a period since post menopausal women do not have real periods – and can be expected for at least six months. It may last much longer. See the webpage cited above for more info on this drug. marcie
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
The reasons doctors suggest HRT is because it is associated with health and longevity — specifically reduced rates of heart disease, osteoporosis — and perhaps Alzheimer’s Disease and Colon cancer. All this is based on preliminary research — although there is quite a bit of consistency in findings. There is also similar research that suggests that HRT over the long term increases the risk of breast cancer. An interesting answer but one which is basically meaningless. Two questions immediately arise. Doctors may suggest hormones for these reasons but that does not, ipso facto, mean that such a suggestion is appropriate or that these are issues with which the menopausal and most-menopausal woman should be especially concerned. Breast cancer risk has been documented in epidemiological studies and just recently in the lab – premarin causes changes in DNA which are precursors to cancers. This danger in hormone use is real. The benefits in the cases of heart disease are ephemeral and the last study (done by Kaiser-Permanente) showed no benefit at all. Also if the Nurses’ Study is corrected for the skewed population and for exclusion of those at highest risk, the difference between the homone and non-hormones groups in terms of heart disease is statistically insignificant.
For the zillionth time -0- the data that supports the idea that breast cancer risks increase with HRT is EXACTLY THE SAME QUALITY OF DATA [AND IN SOME CASES THE SAME DATA] as that which supports heart and bone benefits. The benefits are just as real as the risks. There are several studies which show no increased breast cancer risk — but the preponderance of studies do. Similar findings for heart and bone.
The Alzheimer’s connection, like the colon cancer one, is very tentative and has numerous statistical problems. There are no good studies showing this "benefit" although one notices that it being hyped in the news a great deal lately perhaps because Alzheimer’s is a sufficiently horrible disease that women might be willing to risk breast cancer to avoid it. But as with heart disease the risk of breast cancer is real and documented but the benefit in avoiding Alzheimer’s may not be.
The association with AD is not as well established as with breast cancer i.e. fewer epidemiological studies that have explored this — BUT it is the same kind of evidence. People who get breast cancer are not more ‘real’ nor is their illness than people who don’t have heart attacks, broken hips and AD. Presumably there are REAL women who don’t take hormones and who have had breast cancer and don’t. Similarly there are REAL women who take hrt and have not developed AD, heart attacks or broken hips. I don’t know what your meaning is for REAL — but not having a broken hip as a result of HRT is as real for that woman as developing breast cancer. k
Response:
On Mon, 02 Mar 1998 13:11:30 -0500, anna…@idt.net wrote:
This has all come to as a shock to me since I figured menopause started in the 50’s for most women.
Yes, it comes as a shock to a lot of women, because menopause has been mentioned so little in our society, and everyone seems to assume that one day when they’ll be in their 50’s, it’ll just happen. Actually, according to what I’ve read, the average age for menopause is 50.5 or 51. This is an average, and I assume that more women will have cessation of menstruation close to that age than further away from it. However, averages are obtained by taking all the known numbers, adding them together, and then dividing. So, some women have menopause in their 40’s and some in their 60’s. From what I’ve read, any time between 40 and about 63 is considered to be normal. The next thing that women aren’t prepared for is that menopause is a gradual process. So for a few years before actual menopause, the hormones begin changing, menstrual periods become irregular, and many women begin experiencing some of the symptoms associated with menopause. This time is called perimenopause. It is the opposite of puberty. According to Winnifred Cutler, Ph.D. (author of several books on menopause and related subjects) puberty usually takes around 7 years from the first period, until the periods assume a regular (normal, adult) pattern. She believes that perimenopause averages about the same length of time. If so, then most women can expect to begin experiencing some of these symptoms 5 or more years before actual menopause. I’m
reading Ann Louise Gittleman’s book "Before the Change" and this among other reading has freaked me about synthetic HRT. I have the prescription sitting here next to me and I don’t want to take it. I’ve recently started taking vitamins and they seem to be helping. But I"m still wondering if I should take premphase or not…I would appreciate any feedback….
I have not read that book, so I can’t comment on it. I would suggest doing a lot of reading about menopause, and then make your decision. Dr. Susan Love’s Hormone Book is one excellent book. I like Winnifred Cutler’s Menopause A Guide For Women & Those Who Love Them, too Joan L. usually recommends The Menopause Industry by Sandra Coney. I think there are more good books, but I can’t remember them at the moment. There is a link to the book list at http://www.oxford.net/~tishy/asm.html though. Lianne To reply by e-mail, remove "seesig." from my address. No spam, no announcements, no commercial e-mail, no mailing lists.
Response:
In article <34FC7559.36FE3…@yahoo.com
,
marcie rekenn <rek…@yahoo.com
wrote: Breast cancer risk has been documented in epidemiological studies and just recently in the lab – premarin causes changes in DNA which are precursors to cancers.
I think the study to which you refer is: Bolton JL, Shen L, Qiu S, Chen Y, Zhang F, van Breemen RB, Nikolic D. 1997 (Jan). Alkylation of 2′-Deoxynucleosides and DNA by the Premarin Metabolite 4-Hydroxyequilenin Semiquinone Radical. Chem. Res. Toxicol. This shows that a chemical product which can be synthesized from Premarin in the laboratory has been shown to have effect on DNA. In some cases these products, called catecholestrogens, may be metabolites (breakdown products) of Premarin. This is a significant finding, especially since catecholestrogens are complete carcinogens–i.e. they cause cancer and aren’t just precursors. However, it is not Premarin which does this, it is a product which may or may not occur in significant concentrations as a metabolite of Premarin. In fact, catecholestrogens can occur as metabolites of other forms of estrogen, including the estrogen naturally occuring in the bodies of men and women taking no drugs or hormones at all.
Response:
Hello group. Has anyone else experienced getting hives in connection with HRT or hormonal changes? My 1st bout was when I went off the pill in ‘74. I had hives for 6 mo. Then, about the time my FSH became elevated to 108 pts. I began having hives on and off for days or weeks from ‘93 to present. Very annoying. Can estrogen dominance cause this? Can progesterone deficiency cause this? Any help would be appreciated. carrie
Response:
Hello ILGEM, I haven’t personally experienced this, but please know that it’s definitely normal to have skin problems and allergy changes at this time. Check out the list of menopause signs at Tishy’s web site: http://www.oxford.net/~tishy/33signs.html 15. Itchy, crawly skin (Feeling of ants crawling under the skin, not just dry, itchy skin.) 23. Exacerbation of existing conditions 24. Increase in allergies Welcome to our group. I hope you find help and friends here. Wishing you well, fiona – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -ILGEM wrote in message <19980315024000.VAA21…@ladder03.news.aol.com
… Hello group. Has anyone else experienced getting hives in connection with
HRT
or hormonal changes? My 1st bout was when I went off the pill in ‘74. I
had
hives for 6 mo. Then, about the time my FSH became elevated to 108 pts. I
began
having hives on and off for days or weeks from ‘93 to present. Very
annoying.
Can estrogen dominance cause this? Can progesterone deficiency cause this?
Any
help would be appreciated. carrie
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -wal…@dnvn.com wrote:
The reasons doctors suggest HRT is because it is associated with health and longevity — specifically reduced rates of heart disease, osteoporosis — and perhaps Alzheimer’s Disease and Colon cancer. All this is based on preliminary research — although there is quite a bit of consistency in findings. There is also similar research that suggests that HRT over the long term increases the risk of breast cancer. An interesting answer but one which is basically meaningless. Two questions immediately arise. Doctors may suggest hormones for these reasons but that does not, ipso facto, mean that such a suggestion is appropriate or that these are issues with which the menopausal and most-menopausal woman should be especially concerned. Breast cancer risk has been documented in epidemiological studies and just recently in the lab – premarin causes changes in DNA which are precursors to cancers. This danger in hormone use is real. The benefits in the cases of heart disease are ephemeral and the last study (done by Kaiser-Permanente) showed no benefit at all. Also if the Nurses’ Study is corrected for the skewed population and for exclusion of those at highest risk, the difference between the homone and non-hormones groups in terms of heart disease is statistically insignificant. For the zillionth time -0- the data that supports the idea that breast cancer risks increase with HRT is EXACTLY THE SAME QUALITY OF DATA [AND IN SOME CASES THE SAME DATA] as that which supports heart and bone benefits.
You are, of course, free to interpret the data any way you wish. If you view the negative (I didn’t have a heart attack and I took estrogen therefore the estrogen prevented the heart attack) as the same as the positive ( I took estrogen and I have breast cancer) then you are right. However the breast cancer would seem to me to exist in the here and now while the heart attack might never have happened in any case. Going beyond this argument, one must look at the populations being studied. Women at risk for breast cancer have been excluded from most studies on hormones as were those at risk for heart disease for many years. Using the general population risk numbers to compare the relative risk in these study populations is not quite honest. The end result will present the breast cancer risk as lower than it actually is, since the group on hormones had a lower than normal risk to begin with. and present the cardiac benefit as greater since the group had a lower than average risk for heart disease in the first place. Further a very recent study showed that premarin which has been used in most of the studies actually causes pre-maligninat changes in DNA. It is also important to note that the studies generally compare deaths from breast cancer with deaths AND heart attacks or other cardiovascular event when arguing for a net benefit. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
The benefits are just as real as the risks. There are several studies which show no increased breast cancer risk — but the preponderance of studies do. Similar findings for heart and bone. The Alzheimer’s connection, like the colon cancer one, is very tentative and has numerous statistical problems. There are no good studies showing this "benefit" although one notices that it being hyped in the news a great deal lately perhaps because Alzheimer’s is a sufficiently horrible disease that women might be willing to risk breast cancer to avoid it. But as with heart disease the risk of breast cancer is real and documented but the benefit in avoiding Alzheimer’s may not be. The association with AD is not as well established as with breast cancer i.e. fewer epidemiological studies that have explored this — BUT it is the same kind of evidence. People who get breast cancer are not more ‘real’ nor is their illness than people who don’t have heart attacks, broken hips and AD. Presumably there are REAL women who don’t take hormones and who have had breast cancer and don’t. Similarly there are REAL women who take hrt and have not developed AD, heart attacks or broken hips.
I refer you to the URL posted a day ago as to the position of the AMA on taking estrogen to prevent Alzheimer’s disease. The benefit does NOT outweigh the risk in the collective judgement of the AMA as reported in the JAMA. marcie – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
I don’t know what your meaning is for REAL — but not having a broken hip as a result of HRT is as real for that woman as developing breast cancer. k
Response:
On 3 Mar 1998 wal…@dnvn.com wrote:
For the zillionth time -0- the data that supports the idea that breast cancer risks increase with HRT is EXACTLY THE SAME QUALITY OF DATA [AND IN SOME CASES THE SAME DATA] as that which supports heart and bone benefits. The benefits are just as real as the risks. There are several studies which show no increased breast cancer risk — but the preponderance of studies do. Similar findings for heart and bone.
It seves no one to just blindly reference all these anonymous "studies" that show all these putative findings you just did.. Each study stands and falls on its own merits and studies only what it studies. Slinging conclusions around as if they had some independent validity is irresponsible. We all know you personally -really- want to justify taking hormone drugs for life. And repeatedly, everyone seems to have long acknowldeged this is every woman’s individual right. But this continual attempt to "scientifically" justify these drugs’ use in such a sloppy way is really inappropriate for general readership. IMHO, of course. If you want to cite studies conclusion for sake of argument, please in the future offer the actual title and reference for your arguments. Thank you. shelly
Response:
Lisa wrote:
My mother is 61 and post-menopausal.Last night she told me that she is considering being involved in a medical research study. The study is trying to determine the effects of HRT on slowing-down age-related skin laxity and wrinkling. Would any of you ever consider participating in a medical research study taking HRT for this reason? Apparently there’s a lot of hope surrounding the benefits of being on this particular dose of HRT– and one of them is improvement in overall skin condition. What are your thoughts on HRT in general? I’m concerned for her well being.
In general: I think that, for many women, HRT is overkill. Considering the (few) potential benefits versus the very real risks, I’ve opted to do without. I respect the informed decisions of other women to take hormone drugs, but hope they understand what they’re getting into. This study, however, sounds to me like a desperate effort of the pharmaceutical industry to justify their veiled sales pitches that seem to promise that HRT will keep us young forever, a notion I find patently ridiculous. You might ask your mother this: Is she willing to trade an *proven* increased risk of stroke, cancer and possibly heart disease on the off chance that she might have slightly smoother skin? –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Tishy wrote:
If this is a genuine concern for your mother, see www.oxford.net/~tishy/goingonhrt.html That said, I strongly doubt your motives since your email address leads to a company which says: "We develop brands that not only capture mindshare but develop lead generation and qualifications as well as return on investment. beyond that, we infuse every campaign with unparallel insight into the patient perspective" If that weren’t enough, how about: "Patient Recruitment …….Our tremendous success for patient recruitment for clinical research studies…. ………. our strength in patient recruitment grows out of ten years experience in direct-to-consumer marketing….."
Good catch, Tishy. So our "concerned daughter" is actually doing market research. Yet another example of the underhanded dealings of the pharmaceutical industry, perhaps? I do believe I’ll amend my previous response to a more succinct one: Bite me, Lisa. –Pat Kight kig…@peak.org
Response:
Lisa <lisa.catal…@bbkhealthcare.com
wrote in message
news:9vage3$j5t$1@news.harvard.net…
My mother is 61 and post-menopausal.Last night she told me that she is considering being involved in a medical research study. The study is
trying
to determine the effects of HRT on slowing-down age-related skin laxity
and
wrinkling. Would any of you ever consider participating in a medical research study taking HRT for this reason?
Absolutely not. Apparently there’s a lot of hope
surrounding the benefits of being on this particular dose of HRT– and one of them is improvement in overall skin condition. What are your thoughts
on
HRT in general?
Negative. In the past 10-15 years my doctor went from "preparing" me to take it (he mentioned it as a ‘future’ thing when I was about 34) to not even suggesting it now that I’m dealing with perimenopause (I’m now 49). I would have to start having some pretty damned huge difficulties to even consider taking it. Marilee I’m concerned for her well being. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Thanks, Lisa
Response:
Tishy <ti…@cheerful.com
wrote in message
news:0jih1ucild6l2pdvbuq0kdmgmnnatqgn5g@4ax.com…
If this is a genuine concern for your mother, see www.oxford.net/~tishy/goingonhrt.html That said, I strongly doubt your motives since your email address leads to a company which says: "We develop brands that not only capture mindshare but develop lead generation and qualifications as well as return on investment. beyond that, we infuse every campaign with unparallel insight into the patient perspective" If that weren’t enough, how about:
Damn, you’re good, Tishy. I didn’t even -check- this for a spammer….. Marilee – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
"Patient Recruitment …….Our tremendous success for patient recruitment for clinical research studies…. ………. our strength in patient recruitment grows out of ten years experience in direct-to-consumer marketing….." Tishy On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:11:17 -0500, "Lisa" <lisa.catal…@bbkhealthcare.com wrote: My mother is 61 and post-menopausal.Last night she told me that she is considering being involved in a medical research study. The study is
trying
to determine the effects of HRT on slowing-down age-related skin laxity
and
wrinkling. Would any of you ever consider participating in a medical research study taking HRT for this reason? Apparently there’s a lot of
hope
surrounding the benefits of being on this particular dose of HRT– and
one
of them is improvement in overall skin condition. What are your thoughts
on
HRT in general? I’m concerned for her well being. Thanks, Lisa
Response:
"Marilee" <marilee_…@hotmail.com
wrote in message
news:9vap2k$e50cc$1@ID-76373.news.dfncis.de… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Tishy <ti…@cheerful.com
wrote in message
> news:0jih1ucild6l2pdvbuq0kdmgmnnatqgn5g@4ax.com… > > If this is a genuine concern for your mother, see > > www.oxford.net/~tishy/goingonhrt.html > > That said, I strongly doubt your motives since your email address > > leads to a company which says: > > "We develop brands that not only capture mindshare but develop lead > > generation and qualifications as well as return on investment. beyond > > that, we infuse every campaign with unparallel insight into the > > patient perspective" > > If that weren’t enough, how about: > Damn, you’re good, Tishy. I didn’t even -check- this for a spammer….. > Marilee
here here – well done Tishy
— Val [take one away to email] http://www.geocities.com/brimfasthouse/ Knowing others is Wisdom, knowing yourself is Enlightenment. -LaoTzu
Response:
Tishy says:
That said, I strongly doubt your motives
You go, Tishy! Regards, Laura Blanchard lblanch…@aol.com http://menopause.tripod.com (Land o’Links) http://members.aol.com/lblanch000/
Response:
My mother is 61 and post-menopausal.Last night she told me that she is considering being involved in a medical research study. The study is trying to determine the effects of HRT on slowing-down age-related skin laxity and wrinkling. Would any of you ever consider participating in a medical research study taking HRT for this reason? Apparently there’s a lot of hope surrounding the benefits of being on this particular dose of HRT– and one of them is improvement in overall skin condition. What are your thoughts on HRT in general? I’m concerned for her well being. Thanks, Lisa
Response:
"Lisa" <lisa.catal…@bbkhealthcare.com
wrote in message
news:9vage3$j5t$1@news.harvard.net…
My mother is 61 and post-menopausal.Last night she told me that she is considering being involved in a medical research study. The study is
trying
to determine the effects of HRT on slowing-down age-related skin laxity
and
wrinkling. Would any of you ever consider participating in a medical research study taking HRT for this reason? Apparently there’s a lot of
hope
surrounding the benefits of being on this particular dose of HRT– and one of them is improvement in overall skin condition. What are your thoughts
on
HRT in general? I’m concerned for her well being. Thanks,
No, I would not take part in a study regarding skin and HRT. There are risks with taking HRT and ,(in my opinion), they far outweigh the possible benefits on skin. I take estrogen (hysterectomy with ovaries removed) and it hasn’t improved my skin. In fact, the dryness has gotten worse, not better. Not to mention the hives certain estrogen caused. Gwen – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Lisa
Response:
If this is a genuine concern for your mother, see www.oxford.net/~tishy/goingonhrt.html That said, I strongly doubt your motives since your email address leads to a company which says: "We develop brands that not only capture mindshare but develop lead generation and qualifications as well as return on investment. beyond that, we infuse every campaign with unparallel insight into the patient perspective" If that weren’t enough, how about: "Patient Recruitment …….Our tremendous success for patient recruitment for clinical research studies…. ………. our strength in patient recruitment grows out of ten years experience in direct-to-consumer marketing….." Tishy On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 10:11:17 -0500, "Lisa" – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -<lisa.catal…@bbkhealthcare.com
wrote: My mother is 61 and post-menopausal.Last night she told me that she is considering being involved in a medical research study. The study is trying to determine the effects of HRT on slowing-down age-related skin laxity and wrinkling. Would any of you ever consider participating in a medical research study taking HRT for this reason? Apparently there’s a lot of hope surrounding the benefits of being on this particular dose of HRT– and one of them is improvement in overall skin condition. What are your thoughts on HRT in general? I’m concerned for her well being. Thanks, Lisa
Response:
"DWest1023" <dwest1…@aol.com
wrote in message
news:20020510202547.04419.00012444@mb-fi.aol.com…
I agree with all you said. Even if a women decides not to take
HRT, there are
STILL other things she can do to alleviate problems.
What things have you discovered in your researching and interviewing that guarantee that a woman will feel perfectly, um, "normal" during the perimenopausal years? Marilee – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
Don JW Watchtower
Response:
"DWest1023" <dwest1…@aol.com
wrote in message
news:20020510190218.02602.00010326@mb-dh.aol.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> >"DWest1023" <dwest1…@aol.com
wrote in message
> >news:20020510055002.02375.00001259@mb-fp.aol.com… > >> I guess men and women will never see eye to eye. Men from Mars, women > >> fromVenus…. I understand perfectly what the gentlemen is try to say. > >Whathe > >> said was,because his wife is going through menopause she has become > >difficult > >> to the point of him not wanting to be around her, and losing romantic > >feelings > >> for her. I wish I could lose feelings for my wife until she is finish this
journey or phase of life. It hurts when you find your wife change ALL
OF A
SUDDEN. Would I be happy if my wife took HRT? Well if it ever comes to that, it will be her choice, but if it does, to my wife what HRT does to his,
I
certainly will not argue! So my male friend be glad you got the easy
way
out. I’m seem to be going the natural route and let me tell you, it is HELL. Don Okay, *you* take the hot flashes that are preceded by the jitters & total lack of concentration – sometimes at the rate of several per hour, *you* deal w/ night sweats, *you* deal w/ -knowing- you’re irritable &/or moody
&
it bothers yourself as much as it does others (maybe more), *you* deal
with
tinnitus & hypersensitivity to noises, *you* deal with flooding & huge clots, *you* deal w/ never knowing when a period, flood, or spotting’s
going
to show up – or not show up, *you* go through bouts of severe cramping
that
are beyond-one’s-threshold-of-pain, *you* deal with unexpected zits